Southern
2009 Team Stats (6 games)
49.8
PPG
81.8
Opp
-32.0
Margin
29.8%
FG%
28.6%
3P%
63.9%
FT%
35.8
RPG
8.7
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
50.7
Adj PPG
61.2
Adj Opp PPG
#285
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 889 (#223) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 918 (#228) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 998 (#166) | HCA +85 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -11.8 (#286) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -11.4 (#284) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.323 (#232) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.123 (#282) | AdjNet -17.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.115 (#283) | AdjNet -17.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.277 (#285) | AdjO 50.7 | AdjD 61.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.388 (#251) | AdjO 53.5 | AdjD 58.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.274 (#260) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.295 (#256) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 897 (#234) | RD 119 | GP 28 |
2009 Schedule & Results
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Jackson
|
G | 4 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 14.2 | -1.2 | - | - | - | - | 26.3 | 25.0 | 57.1 | - | 31.6 | 29.8 |
A. Hicks
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 57.1 | 57.1 |
T. Brown
|
NA | 5 | 0.0 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 8.4 | 0.8 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 36.4 | 75.0 | - | 44.6 | 42.9 |
H. Kador
|
G | 3 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 2.3 | - | - | - | - | 11.8 | 12.5 | 90.9 | - | 34.3 | 14.7 |
F. Allen
|
F | 4 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 7.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 53.8 | - | 53.6 | 50.0 |
J. Floyd
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 7.0 | 3.3 | - | - | - | - | 19.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 24.2 | 19.0 |
T. Foster
|
G | 5 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 7.0 | -0.2 | - | - | - | - | 25.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 24.8 | 25.7 |
K. Griffin
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 3.7 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 40.5 | 33.3 |
S. Scott
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | 12.5 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 16.9 | 12.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG