San Francisco Dons
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1067 (#149) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1082 (#144) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +19.7 (#157) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.172 (#367) | - |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-19 | @ | Minnesota Golden Gophers | L | 62 - 80 |
| 2005-11-20 | vs | LIU Brooklyn Blackbirds | L | 46 - 61 |
| 2005-11-25 | vs | Rider Broncs | W | 80 - 44 |
| 2005-11-26 | vs | Oklahoma Sooners | L | 51 - 53 |
| 2005-11-29 | vs | Cal Poly Mustangs | W | 69 - 66 |
| 2005-12-01 | @ | UC Davis Aggies | L | 55 - 69 |
| 2005-12-04 | @ | Long Beach State Beach | L | 52 - 58 |
| 2005-12-08 | vs | Hawai'i Rainbow Wahine | L | 63 - 71 |
| 2005-12-11 | vs | Cal State Fullerton Titans | W | 70 - 63 |
| 2005-12-16 | vs | Denver Pioneers | W | 64 - 59 |
| 2005-12-20 | vs | Fresno State Bulldogs | L | 53 - 73 |
| 2005-12-28 | @ | Boise State Broncos | L | 50 - 61 |
| 2005-12-31 | @ | Nevada Wolf Pack | L | 53 - 59 |
| 2006-01-06 | vs | Pepperdine Waves | W | 69 - 65 |
| 2006-01-08 | vs | Loyola Marymount Lions | L | 59 - 64 |
| 2006-01-14 | @ | Saint Mary's Gaels | L | 46 - 74 |
| 2006-01-19 | @ | Portland Pilots | W | 57 - 54 |
| 2006-01-21 | @ | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 42 - 54 |
| 2006-01-26 | vs | Santa Clara Broncos | L | 61 - 66 |
| 2006-01-28 | vs | Saint Mary's Gaels | - | Preview |
| 2006-01-29 | vs | Saint Mary's Gaels | L | 63 - 68 |
| 2006-02-02 | @ | Loyola Marymount Lions | L | 56 - 63 |
| 2006-02-04 | @ | Pepperdine Waves | L | 55 - 75 |
| 2006-02-15 | vs | San Diego Toreros | W | 59 - 56 |
| 2006-02-17 | @ | Santa Clara Broncos | L | 53 - 67 |
| 2006-02-23 | vs | Portland Pilots | W | 80 - 70 |
| 2006-02-25 | vs | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 53 - 71 |
| 2006-03-02 | @ | Gonzaga Bulldogs | W | 75 - 67 |
| 2006-03-04 | @ | Santa Clara Broncos | L | 65 - 75 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Pierce
|
- | 1 | 36.0 | 23.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 20.0 | - | - | - | 78.6 | 0 | 20.0 | - | 71.0 | 78.6 |
D. Ingerson
|
- | 1 | 19.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 65.0 | 65.0 |
A. Wiggins Jr.
|
- | 1 | 35.0 | 13.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0 | 71.4 | - | 53.8 | 44.4 |
A. Surratt
|
G | 1 | 37.0 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 23.1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 38.4 | 23.1 |
K. Marshall
|
- | 1 | 38.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 66.7 | 0 | - | 45.5 | 45.5 |
J. Byrd
|
- | 1 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
D. Shiller
|
- | 1 | 17.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
M. Bell
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
D. Cavic
|
- | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG