๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

San Diego

2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)

73.0
PPG
71.0
Opp
+2.0
Margin
44.4%
FG%
32.1%
3P%
75.4%
FT%
40.3
RPG
9.3
APG
18.7
TO
73.0
Est. poss./game
67.8
Adj PPG
66.0
Adj Opp PPG
#186
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 863 (returning production + recruiting): last season 916, returning -0, transfers -53, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 901 (#226) Preseason prior 863 (returning production + recruiting): last season 916, returning -0, transfers -53, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 942 (#222) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 943 (#222) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -1.8 (#176) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ -1.9 (#176) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.368 (#180) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +1.3 More โ†’ 0.424 (#187) AdjNet +1.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +1.0 More โ†’ 0.424 (#189) AdjNet +1.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 66.0 More โ†’ 0.448 (#186) AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 66.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 66.1 More โ†’ 0.447 (#186) AdjO 67.8 | AdjD 66.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.441 (#180) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.441 (#180) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 182 | GP 3 More โ†’ 927 (#223) RD 182 | GP 3
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.372 (#212) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 @ New Mexico State Aggies W 61 - 56
2026-11-07 @ UC San Diego Tritons L 88 - 90
2026-11-10 vs Portland State Vikings W 70 - 67
2026-11-14 vs Cal State Northridge Matadors - Preview
2026-11-17 @ Arizona State Sun Devils - Preview
2026-11-21 vs UC Irvine Anteaters - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kylie Ray Kylie Ray G 3 37.0 19.7 6.3 3.3 1.3 0.0 5.0 16.3 9.3 10 3 3.3 3.7 49.0 33.3 100.0 0.04 55.7 51.0
Kiera Pemberton Kiera Pemberton F 3 24.7 11.7 6.0 0.3 1.7 0.7 1.3 7.3 11.7 3 3 1.0 1.6 63.6 25.0 75.0 -2.25 68.6 65.9
Olivia Owens Olivia Owens G 2 27.5 11.5 5.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.5 11.0 9.0 2 2 1.0 1.5 36.4 37.5 80.0 0.56 47.5 43.2
Jessica Ajayi Jessica Ajayi G 3 28.7 10.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.7 7.0 3.7 15 3 5.0 7.0 52.4 40.0 50.0 0.98 65.9 66.7
Eva Ruse Eva Ruse F 3 30.3 9.3 11.0 0.7 1.0 1.0 3.7 7.7 11.7 15 3 5.0 6.6 34.8 25.0 68.8 0.07 46.6 37.0
Sammie Wagner Sammie Wagner G 3 28.3 7.0 2.3 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.7 7.7 2.3 21 3 7.0 9.8 30.4 20.0 55.6 -1.11 38.9 34.8
Braelynn Barnett Braelynn Barnett F 3 7.7 4.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.3 1.3 -10 3 -3.3 -18.3 57.1 50.0 100.0 -1.93 74.2 64.3
Lilly Amor Lilly Amor G 3 22.0 2.0 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.3 0.3 2.3 1.7 -22 3 -7.3 -13.4 28.6 28.6 0 -4.28 42.9 42.9
Ayla Williams Ayla Williams C 3 5.7 1.3 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.3 -5 3 -1.7 -11.7 33.3 0 100.0 -1.82 51.5 33.3
Kate Danner Kate Danner F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rosalie Esser Rosalie Esser G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ryanne Bahnsen-Price Ryanne Bahnsen-Price F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lauren McCall Lauren McCall G 3 5.7 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 -9 3 -3.0 -20.4 0.0 0 0 -1.96 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

179 located field-goal attempts in 3 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Ray29% Ray30% Ray80% Ray100% Amor67% Owens100% Ajayi33% Barnett50% Ajayi50%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Ruse26% Ray37% Wagner67% Ruse33% Ray67% Ajayi60% Amor40% Ray30% Ruse29% Owens27%
Misses: who misses most here

Kylie RayJessica AjayiOlivia OwensSammie WagnerEva RuseBraelynn BarnettLilly Amor

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 28-47 59.6 56 Kylie Ray 29% (16 pts) Kiera Pemberton 25% (14 pts) Eva Ruse 26% (5 misses) Olivia Owens 21% (4 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 27-54 50.0 54 Kylie Ray 30% (16 pts) Kiera Pemberton 22% (12 pts) Kylie Ray 37% (10 misses) Eva Ruse 19% (5 misses)
Mid-range left 5-11 45.5 10 Kylie Ray 80% (8 pts) Eva Ruse 20% (2 pts) Sammie Wagner 67% (4 misses) Kylie Ray 33% (2 misses)
Mid-range center 0-3 0.0 0 - - Eva Ruse 33% (1 misses) Kylie Ray 33% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 2-8 25.0 4 Kylie Ray 100% (4 pts) - Kylie Ray 67% (4 misses) Eva Ruse 17% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 3-8 37.5 9 Lilly Amor 67% (6 pts) Jessica Ajayi 33% (3 pts) Jessica Ajayi 60% (3 misses) Kiera Pemberton 20% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 1-6 16.7 3 Olivia Owens 100% (3 pts) - Lilly Amor 40% (2 misses) Eva Ruse 20% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 6-16 37.5 18 Jessica Ajayi 33% (6 pts) Kiera Pemberton 17% (3 pts) Kylie Ray 30% (3 misses) Jessica Ajayi 20% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 center 2-9 22.2 6 Braelynn Barnett 50% (3 pts) Eva Ruse 50% (3 pts) Eva Ruse 29% (2 misses) Jessica Ajayi 29% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 right 6-17 35.3 18 Jessica Ajayi 50% (9 pts) Kylie Ray 17% (3 pts) Olivia Owens 27% (3 misses) Sammie Wagner 27% (3 misses)