Saint Mary of the Woods College Pomeroys
Also known as: Saint Mary of the Woods College Pomeroys
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 998 (#288) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -9.6 (#474) | HCA +2.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.473 (#376) | AdjO 72.5 | AdjD 73.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.318 (#460) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.345 (#457) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 896 (#507) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-15 | @ | Southeast Missouri State Redhawks | L | 56 - 93 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Merriweather
|
- | 1 | 30.0 | 14.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 57.1 | - | 63.2 | 62.5 |
M. Tansmore
|
- | 1 | 28.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 33.3 | - | 33.9 | 33.3 |
J. Burdick
|
- | 1 | 25.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 37.5 |
A. Irvin Jr.
|
- | 1 | 27.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -0.19 | 34.2 | 14.3 |
Z. Baker
|
- | 1 | 15.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 67.6 | 62.5 |
J. Bonds
|
F | 1 | 25.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | - | 42.9 | 42.9 |
M. Pearson
|
- | 1 | 13.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 51.0 | 40.0 |
B. Chestnut
|
F | 1 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 40.0 | 40.0 |
T. Hill
|
- | 1 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | - | 15.1 | 0.0 |
J. Moore
|
G | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | -62 | -3.1 | -4.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0 |
C. Owens
|
- | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
R. Roshel
|
G | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG