Saint Louis Billikens
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1059 (#154) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1094 (#128) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.1 (#188) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.533 (#169) | - |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-21 | vs | Weber State Wildcats | L | 60 - 70 |
| 2005-11-25 | vs | Yale Bulldogs | W | 65 - 50 |
| 2005-11-26 | vs | Miami (OH) RedHawks | L | 55 - 62 |
| 2005-11-30 | @ | Youngstown State Penguins | L | 71 - 80 |
| 2005-12-03 | @ | Illinois Fighting Illini | L | 40 - 75 |
| 2005-12-10 | vs | Western Illinois Leathernecks | L | 44 - 57 |
| 2005-12-13 | @ | Eastern Michigan Eagles | L | 59 - 67 |
| 2005-12-18 | @ | Bradley Braves | L | 65 - 77 |
| 2005-12-22 | vs | Southern Illinois Salukis | W | 63 - 61 |
| 2005-12-28 | @ | Central Michigan Chippewas | L | 55 - 65 |
| 2005-12-31 | vs | Utah State Aggies | W | 75 - 61 |
| 2006-01-03 | vs | Richmond Spiders | L | 65 - 71 |
| 2006-01-06 | @ | Xavier Musketeers | L | 61 - 77 |
| 2006-01-08 | @ | Dayton Flyers | L | 73 - 95 |
| 2006-01-13 | @ | Saint Joseph's Hawks | L | 50 - 69 |
| 2006-01-15 | vs | Duquesne Dukes | W | 59 - 54 |
| 2006-01-22 | vs | Charlotte 49ers | L | 57 - 86 |
| 2006-01-27 | @ | Duquesne Dukes | L | 66 - 67 |
| 2006-01-29 | @ | St. Bonaventure Bonnies | L | 59 - 71 |
| 2006-02-03 | vs | La Salle Explorers | W | 70 - 60 |
| 2006-02-06 | @ | George Washington Revolutionaries | L | 46 - 84 |
| 2006-02-10 | vs | Temple Owls | L | 43 - 62 |
| 2006-02-12 | vs | Rhode Island Rams | W | 72 - 59 |
| 2006-02-17 | vs | Dayton Flyers | L | 67 - 72 |
| 2006-02-19 | @ | Charlotte 49ers | L | 58 - 65 |
| 2006-02-23 | vs | Massachusetts Minutewomen | W | 61 - 57 |
| 2006-02-26 | @ | Fordham Rams | L | 58 - 70 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Vouyoukas
|
- | 2 | 30.0 | 17.0 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 9.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 61.1 | 0.0 | 85.7 | - | 70.4 | 61.1 |
J. Johnson
|
F | 2 | 30.0 | 11.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 11.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 39.1 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 44.4 | 39.1 |
Dion Brown
|
- | 2 | 17.0 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 44.4 | 0.0 | - | 64.3 | 66.7 |
T. Liddell
|
- | 2 | 36.0 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 10.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 25.0 | 75.0 | - | 36.8 | 32.5 |
D. Polk
|
- | 2 | 20.5 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 6.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 54.2 | 54.2 |
K. Lisch
|
- | 2 | 30.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 21.4 | 22.2 | 0 | - | 28.6 | 28.6 |
L. Meyer
|
- | 2 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 40.0 | 40.0 |
B. Husak
|
- | 2 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 53.2 | 0.0 |
V. Newborne
|
- | 2 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
A. Drejaj
|
G | 1 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG