SMU Mustangs
2009 Team Stats (2 games)
58.5
PPG
65.0
Opp
+3.5
Margin
34.7%
FG%
25.8%
3P%
69.4%
FT%
39.5
RPG
12.5
APG
0.0
TO
68.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1001 (#201) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1025 (#211) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +21.2 (#131) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.530 (#170) | - |
2009 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-11-14 | vs | UT Arlington Mavericks | L | 79 - 85 |
| 2008-11-21 | @ | Arkansas Razorbacks | L | 69 - 78 |
| 2008-11-24 | @ | Eastern Illinois Panthers | L | 65 - 71 |
| 2008-11-28 | vs | Sam Houston Bearkats | W | 73 - 52 |
| 2008-11-29 | vs | Charlotte 49ers | L | 74 - 76 |
| 2008-12-02 | vs | Texas A&M-Corpus Christi Islanders | W | 73 - 65 |
| 2008-12-07 | @ | Texas A&M Aggies | L | 48 - 80 |
| 2008-12-14 | vs | North Texas Mean Green | W | 74 - 57 |
| 2008-12-16 | vs | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 65 - 63 |
| 2008-12-19 | vs | Jacksonville Dolphins | L | 65 - 67 |
| 2008-12-20 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | W | 63 - 56 |
| 2008-12-28 | vs | Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions | W | 92 - 75 |
| 2008-12-30 | @ | TCU Horned Frogs | W | 79 - 75 |
| 2009-01-03 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 67 - 56 |
| 2009-01-08 | vs | Marshall Thundering Herd | L | 63 - 70 |
| 2009-01-10 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | W | 80 - 73 |
| 2009-01-18 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 65 - 53 |
| 2009-01-22 | @ | Tulane Green Wave | W | 59 - 56 |
| 2009-01-24 | @ | UTEP Miners | W | 70 - 64 |
| 2009-01-29 | vs | Houston Cougars | W | 59 - 56 |
| 2009-01-31 | vs | Rice Owls | W | 68 - 52 |
| 2009-02-05 | @ | Southern Miss Lady Eagles | L | 65 - 75 |
| 2009-02-07 | @ | UCF Knights | L | 68 - 78 |
| 2009-02-12 | @ | Memphis Tigers | W | 71 - 57 |
| 2009-02-15 | vs | UAB Blazers | W | 81 - 51 |
| 2009-02-20 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 73 - 75 |
| 2009-02-22 | @ | Rice Owls | W | 63 - 41 |
| 2009-02-26 | vs | Tulane Green Wave | W | 61 - 49 |
| 2009-02-28 | vs | UTEP Miners | W | 78 - 65 |
| 2009-03-06 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | W | 77 - 69 |
| 2009-03-07 | vs | UCF Knights | L | 51 - 62 |
| 2009-03-19 | @ | Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters | L | 54 - 77 |
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B. Gilliam
|
F | 2 | 0.0 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 16.5 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 42.4 | 25.0 | 60.0 | - | 48.3 | 47.0 |
M. Faye
|
- | 2 | 30.5 | 15.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 10.5 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 52.4 | 37.5 | 75.0 | - | 63.2 | 59.5 |
D. Wills
|
F | 2 | 0.0 | 14.5 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 10.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 55.0 | 0 | 77.8 | - | 60.5 | 55.0 |
P. McCoy
|
- | 2 | 35.5 | 13.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 45.8 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 47.2 | 45.8 |
B. Fall
|
- | 2 | 32.5 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 52.9 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 53.3 | 52.9 |
H. Day
|
G | 2 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 72.0 | 63.6 |
D. Williams
|
- | 2 | 33.0 | 9.5 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 49.2 | 44.4 |
R. Nyakundi
|
- | 2 | 23.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 30.8 | 66.7 | - | 46.2 | 43.8 |
J. Samuels
|
G | 2 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 25.0 | 75.0 | - | 35.4 | 30.6 |
P. Dia
|
- | 2 | 10.5 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0 | 0 | - | 45.5 | 45.5 |
M. Walker
|
- | 2 | 14.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 28.6 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
F. Otis
|
- | 2 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 29.1 | 33.3 |
A. Severin
|
C | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
R. Harp
|
- | 2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Haynes
|
- | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG