🐻⬇️🏀

Rutgers-Camden

Also known as: Rutgers-Camden
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 927 (#370) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 990 (#336) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 1013 (#344) HCA +62 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → -6.6 (#260) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → -4.6 (#427) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.114 (#625) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +3.6 More → 0.633 (#308) NetEff +3.6
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -28.2 More → 0.037 (#620) AdjNet -28.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -28.8 More → 0.032 (#620) AdjNet -28.8
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 53.9 | AdjD 72.5 More → 0.155 (#624) AdjO 53.9 | AdjD 72.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.6 | AdjD 64.5 More → 0.481 (#415) AdjO 63.6 | AdjD 64.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.457 (#415) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.466 (#413) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 99 | GP 22 More → 1011 (#289) RD 99 | GP 22

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-08 vs Drew L 57 - 71
2025-11-11 @ Haverford L 54 - 72
2025-11-14 vs Baruch W 69 - 42
2025-11-15 vs FDU-Florham W 59 - 52
2025-11-19 vs Gwynedd Mercy W 76 - 47
2025-11-22 vs Colby L 54 - 62
2025-11-25 vs Rutgers-Newark W 69 - 44
2025-12-03 vs Rowan L 59 - 65
2025-12-10 vs TCNJ W 54 - 53
2025-12-13 @ Montclair St. L 56 - 69
2026-01-10 vs Kean W 66 - 38
2026-01-14 @ New Jersey City W 82 - 62
2026-01-17 vs Wm. Paterson L 54 - 77
2026-01-21 @ Rutgers-Newark W 87 - 54
2026-01-24 vs Ramapo W 82 - 59
2026-01-28 @ Rowan L 73 - 80
2026-01-31 vs Montclair St. W 70 - 66
2026-02-04 @ TCNJ L 61 - 81
2026-02-07 @ Kean W 76 - 61

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Courtney Edmundo - 18 31.5 16.2 11.1 2.8 1.7 1.7 4.4 11.3 17.7 1 0.1 0.5 49.0 35.7 74.8 -0.7 58.6 52.7
Edmundo, Courtney - 1 35.0 16.0 8.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 13.0 13.0 - - - 53.8 0 66.7 - 55.9 53.8
El, Tamea - 1 34.0 16.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 15.0 - - - 72.7 0.0 0 - 72.7 72.7
Hope Goodwine - 18 29.5 12.8 2.7 2.8 1.4 0.1 4.3 10.7 4.8 44 3.7 23.1 35.8 30.0 78.1 1.22 49.1 40.4
Tamea El - 18 30.9 10.3 7.9 1.8 0.9 0.2 1.3 10.1 9.7 25 2.1 13.1 41.2 18.8 65.3 0.18 45.4 42.0
Collier, Tamyia - 1 27.0 8.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 10.0 - - - 14.3 0.0 75.0 - 38.0 14.3
Gabriella Toledo - 18 23.7 6.9 1.6 1.0 1.5 0.0 1.1 6.4 3.5 -4 -0.3 -3.0 34.5 34.4 64.7 -1.57 50.2 48.7
Tamyia Collier - 18 24.5 6.5 4.9 1.3 1.6 0.4 2.2 6.7 5.8 18 1.5 13.8 38.3 9.1 68.6 0.35 43.2 38.8
Tireya Wyatt - 18 14.2 5.1 1.6 0.8 0.8 0.1 1.0 5.7 1.6 -46 -5.1 -67.3 32.4 28.6 50.0 1.83 42.8 42.2
Goodwine, Hope - 1 21.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 6.0 8.0 -4.0 - - - 25.0 20.0 0 - 31.2 31.2
Zairra Galloway - 17 17.5 4.1 3.8 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.1 4.5 4.9 -4 -0.4 -6.2 36.8 50.0 56.5 0.53 40.6 37.5
Patino, Mya - 1 23.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 5.0 -1.0 - - - 40.0 0.0 0 - 40.0 40.0
Galloway, Ziarra - 1 17.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 - - - 40.0 0 0 - 40.0 40.0
Mya Patino - 18 22.7 3.8 2.6 1.2 1.1 0.0 1.8 4.7 2.3 15 1.4 14.3 26.2 27.0 57.1 -1.57 38.3 36.3
Toledo, Gabriella - 1 30.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 5.0 6.0 -4.0 - - - 16.7 20.0 0 - 25.0 25.0
Julissa Vicente - 3 3.0 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.3 1.3 - - - 100.0 100.0 50.0 - 106.4 150.0
Amber Perry - 14 8.4 1.1 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 2.1 0.1 29 2.1 18.6 24.1 0 25.0 0.12 24.4 24.1
Wyatt, Tireya - 1 13.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 -1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 50.0 - 8.5 0.0
Lilia Ortiz - 10 2.6 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 -0.2 - - - 20.0 0.0 50.0 - 25.5 20.0
Kaliyah Harris - 6 2.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 8 0.4 2.9 0.0 0 0 -1.62 0.0 0.0
Madie Thomas - 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG