Rutgers Scarlet - 2014

2014 Team Stats (7 games)

59.1

PPG

77.9

Opp

-16.6

Margin

38.2%

FG%

28.3%

3P%

65.2%

FT%

32.9

RPG

11.0

APG

16.3

TO

79.2

Pace

Model Outputs

2013-2014

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	1444 (#91)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	1450 (#71)	-
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More →	+30.8 (#84)	HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.022 (#111)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -30.8 More →	0.027 (#84)	NetEff -30.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -14.7 More →	0.155 (#97)	AdjNet -14.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -15.7 More →	0.136 (#100)	AdjNet -15.7

2014 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2014-01-04	vs	Louisville Cardinals	L	76 - 83
2014-02-04	@	Memphis Tigers	L	69 - 101
2014-02-13	vs	SMU Mustangs	-	Preview
2014-02-16	@	Louisville Cardinals	L	54 - 102
2014-02-20	vs	Memphis Tigers	L	59 - 64
2014-03-05	@	UConn Huskies	L	63 - 69
2014-03-08	vs	Cincinnati Bearcats	L	66 - 70
2014-03-12	vs	South Florida Bulls	W	72 - 68
2014-03-13	@	Louisville Cardinals	L	31 - 92
2014-04-02	@	South Florida Bulls	W	62 - 52

2014 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
K. Jack	F	8	29.5	13.1	6.5	0.2	0.8	0.6	2.5	10.0	8.8	-	-	-	50.0	0.0	69.4	-	54.8	50.0
M. Mack	G	8	30.2	12.2	2.6	4.5	1.1	0.1	3.4	11.0	6.2	-	-	-	36.4	36.0	100.0	0.05	51.6	46.6
J. Moore	F	8	26.0	9.1	1.5	1.2	1.1	0.4	0.9	8.5	4.0	16	1.6	4.3	36.8	22.9	65.2	1.3	46.7	42.6
W. Judge	F	8	22.2	6.8	6.0	1.0	1.1	1.0	1.9	5.8	8.2	-	-	-	39.1	0.0	58.1	-	45.3	39.1
K. Okoro	G	5	10.0	5.2	1.2	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.8	3.2	2.8	-	-	-	56.2	57.1	80.0	-	71.4	68.8
C. Brown	F	8	14.8	4.2	2.4	0.1	0.1	0.0	1.5	4.1	1.2	26	2.0	2.2	33.3	18.2	62.5	1.01	42.5	36.4
M. Kone	G	7	19.6	4.1	3.7	0.7	0.9	0.3	1.1	3.7	4.9	-	-	-	34.6	28.6	64.3	-	45.1	38.5
D. Campbell	G	4	14.5	3.2	0.5	0.8	0.0	0.0	1.8	3.5	-0.8	10	2.0	6.3	21.4	12.5	66.7	0.06	36.2	25.0
J. Etou	F	8	22.1	3.0	4.0	0.6	0.2	0.0	1.5	3.8	2.6	-	-	-	30.0	0.0	66.7	-	35.3	30.0
J. Seagears	G	8	13.9	2.8	1.0	1.8	0.4	0.0	1.4	3.5	1.0	-	-	-	28.6	33.3	50.0	-	38.1	37.5
G. Lewis	F	7	9.9	1.7	2.0	0.6	0.0	0.6	0.7	1.4	2.7	-17	-1.3	-5.7	60.0	0	0.0	0.06	53.0	60.0
C. Evans	F	1	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	-1.0	-	-	-	0	0	0	0.41	0	0
S. Zurich	F	3	5.3	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.0	-	-	-	0.0	0.0	0	-	0.0	0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG