Rhode Island Rams
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1259 (#47) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1077 (#149) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.1 (#186) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.238 (#329) | - |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-18 | vs | Hartford Hawks | L | 22 - 28 |
| 2005-11-22 | vs | Harvard Crimson | L | 48 - 77 |
| 2005-11-25 | vs | Brown Bears | W | 75 - 71 |
| 2005-11-26 | vs | Villanova Wildcats | L | 44 - 65 |
| 2005-11-30 | @ | Maine Black Bears | W | 65 - 48 |
| 2005-12-04 | @ | Marquette Golden Eagles | L | 49 - 64 |
| 2005-12-07 | @ | Holy Cross Crusaders | W | 72 - 68 |
| 2005-12-10 | vs | Providence Friars | L | 66 - 69 |
| 2005-12-28 | @ | Florida Gators | L | 62 - 76 |
| 2005-12-30 | @ | Liberty Flames | L | 57 - 67 |
| 2006-01-03 | vs | La Salle Explorers | L | 48 - 55 |
| 2006-01-05 | vs | Illinois Fighting Illini | L | 62 - 73 |
| 2006-01-08 | vs | Xavier Musketeers | W | 68 - 66 |
| 2006-01-13 | @ | Massachusetts Minutewomen | W | 63 - 54 |
| 2006-01-16 | @ | La Salle Explorers | L | 53 - 61 |
| 2006-01-20 | vs | George Washington Revolutionaries | L | 54 - 72 |
| 2006-01-22 | vs | Duquesne Dukes | L | 51 - 73 |
| 2006-01-27 | @ | Dayton Flyers | L | 51 - 62 |
| 2006-01-29 | @ | Saint Joseph's Hawks | L | 47 - 75 |
| 2006-02-02 | vs | Massachusetts Minutewomen | L | 43 - 54 |
| 2006-02-05 | @ | Fordham Rams | W | 59 - 54 |
| 2006-02-10 | @ | Richmond Spiders | L | 54 - 77 |
| 2006-02-12 | @ | Saint Louis Billikens | L | 59 - 72 |
| 2006-02-17 | vs | St. Bonaventure Bonnies | W | 67 - 60 |
| 2006-02-19 | vs | Fordham Rams | W | 79 - 65 |
| 2006-02-24 | @ | Charlotte 49ers | L | 67 - 74 |
| 2006-02-26 | vs | Temple Owls | L | 79 - 91 |
| 2006-03-03 | @ | Dayton Flyers | L | 63 - 71 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Wise
|
- | 2 | 33.5 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
W. Daniels
|
- | 2 | 27.0 | 9.5 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 9.5 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 28.6 | 100.0 | - | 48.9 | 47.4 |
J. Baron
|
- | 2 | 26.5 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 28.6 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
D. Robinson
|
- | 2 | 32.5 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 10.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 23.8 | 0.0 | 87.5 | - | 34.7 | 23.8 |
P. Bitee
|
- | 2 | 24.5 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 50.0 | 0.0 | - | 60.3 | 62.5 |
K. Faris
|
NA | 2 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 70.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 70.0 | 70.0 |
K. Seawright
|
- | 2 | 15.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
J.R. Moore
|
- | 2 | 10.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 64.4 | 66.7 |
D. Harris
|
- | 2 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
T. Sullivan
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG