Radford
2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)
78.5
PPG
53.2
Opp
+25.2
Margin
47.2%
FG%
35.1%
3P%
64.4%
FT%
42.3
RPG
14.0
APG
14.3
TO
72.1
Est. poss./game
63.3
Adj PPG
60.7
Adj Opp PPG
#142
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2026-2027
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1036 (#143) | Preseason prior 1031 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1032, returning +59, transfers -60, freshmen +0 |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1017 (#145) | HCA +169 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1018 (#145) | HCA +169 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +1.8 (#146) | HCA +1.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +1.8 (#146) | HCA +1.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.492 (#160) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.485 (#164) | AdjNet -2.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.461 (#173) | AdjNet -4.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.551 (#142) | AdjO 63.3 | AdjD 60.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.552 (#141) | AdjO 63.4 | AdjD 60.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.513 (#161) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.513 (#161) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 986 (#168) | RD 176 | GP 3 |
| Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.507 (#156) | Chronological component blend with rest and venue. |
Rank through the season
League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.
Recency Ensemble
Log Adjusted
Elo
Points Off/Def Recency
2026-2027 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | @ | Clemson Tigers | L | 47 - 68 |
| 2026-11-04 | vs | Bluefield Ramblin' Rams | W | 128 - 24 |
| 2026-11-07 | @ | Eastern Kentucky Colonels | L | 56 - 65 |
| 2026-11-11 | @ | Campbell Fighting Camels | W | 83 - 56 |
| 2026-11-16 | vs | Ferrum Panthers | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-19 | @ | Tennessee Lady Volunteers | - | Preview |
2026-2027 Roster
Estimated Minutes by Position
Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angelina Nice
|
G | 4 | 25.2 | 17.0 | 7.5 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 12.0 | 14.8 | 36 | 4 | 9.0 | 14.3 | 56.2 | 28.6 | 66.7 | -0.43 | 62.3 | 60.4 |
Georgia Simonsen
|
F | 4 | 23.2 | 12.5 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 11.0 | 37 | 4 | 9.2 | 15.9 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 68.2 | 0.2 | 57.2 | 51.5 |
Logan Luebbers Palmer
|
G | 4 | 21.2 | 8.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 7.0 | 4.8 | 52 | 4 | 13.0 | 25.1 | 46.4 | 38.5 | 100.0 | 0.13 | 58.8 | 55.4 |
Cherish Haywood
|
G | 4 | 23.5 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.2 | 9.0 | 51 | 4 | 12.8 | 21.7 | 52.0 | 25.0 | 71.4 | 1.62 | 58.8 | 56.0 |
Jordin Richardson
|
G | 4 | 17.8 | 8.2 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 6.2 | 6.5 | 36 | 4 | 9.0 | 21.2 | 56.0 | 25.0 | 36.4 | 1.0 | 55.3 | 58.0 |
Kailyn Fields
|
G | 4 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 7.8 | 3.2 | 52 | 4 | 13.0 | 19.9 | 35.5 | 43.8 | 75.0 | 1.56 | 48.8 | 46.8 |
Cate Carlson
|
G | 4 | 22.5 | 5.2 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 7.0 | 30 | 4 | 7.5 | 13.8 | 41.2 | 40.0 | 75.0 | -0.52 | 56.0 | 52.9 |
Kerri Fluellen
|
G | 4 | 10.0 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 16 | 4 | 4.0 | 17.3 | 71.4 | 100.0 | 0 | -0.8 | 78.6 | 78.6 |
Ralee Bare
|
G | 3 | 9.0 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 35 | 3 | 11.7 | 54.2 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 75.0 | 0.77 | 41.0 | 31.2 |
Amanda Mitchell
|
F | 3 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 35 | 4 | 8.8 | 91.6 | 33.3 | 0 | 80.0 | 1.02 | 48.8 | 33.3 |
Anaiah Jenkins
|
F | 4 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 35 | 4 | 8.8 | 27.7 | 23.1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.23 | 33.9 | 23.1 |
Jada Green
|
F | 3 | 6.7 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 17 | 3 | 5.7 | 35.9 | 66.7 | 0 | 33.3 | -2.07 | 57.9 | 66.7 |
Anna Chacha
|
F | 2 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 8 | 2 | 4.0 | 37.7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2026-2027 Shot Zones
246 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Angelina NiceGeorgia SimonsenLogan Luebbers PalmerJordin RichardsonKailyn FieldsCherish HaywoodCate CarlsonAmanda Mitchell
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 57-87 | 65.5 | 114 | Angelina Nice 28% (32 pts) | Cherish Haywood 14% (16 pts) | Georgia Simonsen 23% (7 misses) | Logan Luebbers Palmer 20% (6 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 27-68 | 39.7 | 54 | Angelina Nice 26% (14 pts) | Georgia Simonsen 26% (14 pts) | Georgia Simonsen 20% (8 misses) | Kailyn Fields 17% (7 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 3-4 | 75.0 | 6 | Cate Carlson 33% (2 pts) | Georgia Simonsen 33% (2 pts) | Cherish Haywood 100% (1 misses) | - |
| Mid-range center | 0-4 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Amanda Mitchell 25% (1 misses) | Cherish Haywood 25% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 3-9 | 33.3 | 6 | Kailyn Fields 67% (4 pts) | Georgia Simonsen 33% (2 pts) | Kailyn Fields 33% (2 misses) | Cate Carlson 17% (1 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 2-6 | 33.3 | 6 | Cate Carlson 50% (3 pts) | Logan Luebbers Palmer 50% (3 pts) | Cherish Haywood 50% (2 misses) | Anaiah Jenkins 25% (1 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 1-1 | 100.0 | 3 | Jordin Richardson 100% (3 pts) | - | - | - |
| Above-break 3 left | 15-35 | 42.9 | 45 | Logan Luebbers Palmer 27% (12 pts) | Angelina Nice 20% (9 pts) | Logan Luebbers Palmer 25% (5 misses) | Cate Carlson 20% (4 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 2-14 | 14.3 | 6 | Cherish Haywood 50% (3 pts) | Kailyn Fields 50% (3 pts) | Kailyn Fields 42% (5 misses) | Angelina Nice 25% (3 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 6-18 | 33.3 | 18 | Kailyn Fields 50% (9 pts) | Angelina Nice 17% (3 pts) | Angelina Nice 33% (4 misses) | Jordin Richardson 17% (2 misses) |