Quinnipiac Bobcats
2023 Team Stats (3 games)
51.0
PPG
70.5
Opp
-21.0
Margin
37.2%
FG%
26.2%
3P%
76.5%
FT%
32.3
RPG
11.0
APG
20.3
TO
77.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1119 (#113) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1108 (#148) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +23.1 (#124) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.803 (#72) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-07 | @ | NC State Wolfpack | L | 45 - 82 |
| 2022-11-20 | @ | Indiana Hoosiers | L | 55 - 92 |
| 2022-11-26 | @ | Kent State Golden Flashes | L | 55 - 58 |
| 2023-03-09 | vs | Manhattan Jaspers | L | 43 - 50 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Baskerville
|
F | 3 | 16.3 | 8.3 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 62.5 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 68.7 | 62.5 |
R. Caverly
|
G | 3 | 28.7 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 7.7 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 34.8 | 14.3 | 53.8 | - | 41.8 | 37.0 |
M. Morris
|
C | 3 | 20.0 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 44.2 | 41.7 |
C. Haywood
|
G | 3 | 26.3 | 7.0 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 9.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 10.0 | 80.0 | - | 33.4 | 24.1 |
J. Grisdale
|
G | 3 | 36.0 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 6.3 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 31.6 | 22.2 | 0 | - | 36.8 | 36.8 |
M. Helms
|
G | 3 | 21.3 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 4.7 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 43.7 | 39.3 |
R. Douglas
|
G | 2 | 16.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
R. Caso
|
F | 1 | 14.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 51.5 | 33.3 |
E. O'Donnell
|
F | 3 | 16.0 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 45.8 | 45.8 |
G. LaBarge
|
F | 3 | 10.3 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 42.9 | 0 | - | 64.3 | 64.3 |
M. DeWees
|
G | 1 | 23.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
T. White
|
F | 2 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG