Quinnipiac Bobcats
2022 Team Stats (4 games)
57.8
PPG
58.8
Opp
-1.0
Margin
36.1%
FG%
29.9%
3P%
78.8%
FT%
34.5
RPG
12.5
APG
13.5
TO
74.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1118 (#111) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1120 (#131) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +23.2 (#125) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.803 (#69) | - |
2022 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | vs | Indiana Hoosiers | L | 59 - 67 |
| 2021-11-22 | @ | George Washington Revolutionaries | L | 50 - 54 |
| 2022-03-09 | vs | Saint Peter's Peacocks | W | 63 - 42 |
| 2022-03-11 | vs | Manhattan Jaspers | L | 59 - 72 |
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. DeWees
|
G | 4 | 31.8 | 12.2 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 9.5 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 39.5 | 25.0 | 81.8 | 1.18 | 51.4 | 40.8 |
M. Morris
|
C | 4 | 31.8 | 12.0 | 10.2 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 13.5 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 35.2 | 20.0 | 72.7 | 1.08 | 40.8 | 37.0 |
C. Haywood
|
G | 4 | 24.8 | 7.8 | 5.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 7.2 | 78 | 4.1 | 23.1 | 43.5 | 33.3 | 75.0 | 1.08 | 58.4 | 54.3 |
R. Caverly
|
G | 4 | 37.5 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 29 | 1.3 | 18.8 | 31.0 | 37.5 | 57.1 | 0.63 | 43.6 | 41.4 |
T. White
|
F | 2 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | -19 | -1.7 | -9.1 | 63.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 | 63.6 | 63.6 |
S. Bonner
|
G | 4 | 23.8 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 69 | 2.5 | 17.2 | 42.9 | 40.0 | 83.3 | 0.47 | 63.1 | 57.1 |
J. Grisdale
|
G | 2 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 74 | 3.7 | 17.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.81 | 51.5 | 33.3 |
A. Free
|
F | 4 | 16.5 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 5.5 | 0.0 | -1 | -0.1 | -0.6 | 22.7 | 23.1 | 100.0 | 0.38 | 32.8 | 29.5 |
M. Helms
|
G | 4 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 24 | 1.0 | 6.7 | 26.7 | 25.0 | 75.0 | 0.66 | 35.8 | 30.0 |
G. LaBarge
|
F | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 57 | 5.2 | 27.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.59 | 53.2 | 0.0 |
C. Almeida
|
F | 2 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.28 | 75.0 | 75.0 |
H. Smith
|
G | 3 | 5.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | -0.7 | -32 | -1.3 | -7.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
J. Casey
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.43 | 0 | 0 |
R. Douglas
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | 52 | 10.4 | 94.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.03 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG