🐻⬇️🏀

Portland Fire

Season: 2026 2002 2001 2000
Also known as: Portland Fire
Program History

2026 Team Stats (2 games)

78.0
PPG
85.7
Opp
-4.2
Margin
42.9%
FG%
24.4%
3P%
70.4%
FT%
31.0
RPG
15.0
APG
20.0
TO
91.6
Pace

Model Outputs

2002 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2026 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 945 (#13) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1014 (#8) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More → -0.6 (#10) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.450 (#10) -

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-04-29 @ Seattle Storm L 81 - 91
2026-05-03 vs Los Angeles Sparks L 75 - 85
2026-05-09 vs Chicago Sky L 83 - 98
2026-05-12 vs New York Liberty W 98 - 96
2026-05-14 vs New York Liberty L 82 - 100
2026-05-18 vs Connecticut Sun W 83 - 82
2026-05-20 @ Indiana Fever L 73 - 90
2026-05-23 @ Toronto Tempo W 99 - 80
2026-05-25 @ New York Liberty W 81 - 74
2026-05-27 vs Connecticut Sun W 71 - 61
2026-05-29 vs Atlanta Dream L 66 - 86
2026-05-30 vs Indiana Fever W 100 - 84
2026-06-02 @ Golden State Valkyries L 77 - 95
2026-06-05 vs Phoenix Mercury L 72 - 78

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
S. Barker S. Barker G 1 33.0 14.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 10.0 12.0 - - - 40.0 0.0 75.0 - 51.8 40.0
C. Leite C. Leite G 2 22.0 11.5 1.5 4.0 0.5 0.0 3.5 6.0 8.0 - - - 58.3 66.7 53.8 - 64.9 66.7
L. Geiselsoder L. Geiselsoder C 2 21.0 11.0 3.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 3.0 5.5 7.0 - - - 45.5 33.3 90.9 - 69.4 54.5
S. Williams S. Williams - 2 14.5 10.5 5.5 0.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 4.5 13.0 - - - 66.7 0 75.0 - 73.5 66.7
B. Carleton B. Carleton F 1 25.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 8.0 3.0 - - - 37.5 20.0 50.0 - 46.1 43.8
Megan Gustafson Megan Gustafson C 1 23.0 8.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 7.0 3.0 - - - 42.9 25.0 50.0 - 50.8 50.0
N. Puoch N. Puoch F 2 22.0 8.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 1.0 5.0 7.5 - - - 50.0 50.0 50.0 - 59.2 60.0
Haley Jones Haley Jones G 2 24.5 7.0 5.0 1.0 2.5 0.0 4.0 8.0 3.5 - - - 37.5 0.0 100.0 - 41.5 37.5
J. Harrison J. Harrison - 2 19.5 7.0 2.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 6.5 5.5 - - - 30.8 0.0 100.0 - 44.8 30.8
E. Engstler E. Engstler F 1 17.0 5.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 12.0 - - - 40.0 33.3 0 - 50.0 50.0
F. Bühner F. Bühner F 1 21.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 -1.0 - - - 16.7 0.0 75.0 - 32.2 16.7
P. Williams P. Williams - 1 7.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 0.0 - 104.2 150.0
Maya Caldwell Maya Caldwell G 1 15.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - - - 33.3 0.0 0 - 33.3 33.3
C. Bibby C. Bibby F 1 16.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG