Portland Fire
Also known as: Portland Fire
Program History
2026 Team Stats (2 games)
78.0
PPG
91.8
Opp
-6.1
Margin
42.9%
FG%
24.4%
3P%
70.4%
FT%
31.0
RPG
15.0
APG
20.0
TO
91.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 906 (#10) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 930 (#10) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 956 (#11) | HCA +51 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -5.2 (#14) | HCA +1.6 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -1.6 (#11) | HCA +1.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.296 (#14) | - |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.434 (#12) | AdjO 88.2 | AdjD 91.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.415 (#13) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.419 (#12) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 940 (#10) | RD 86 | GP 28 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | @ | Seattle Storm | L | 81 - 91 |
| 2026-05-03 | vs | Los Angeles Sparks | L | 75 - 85 |
| 2026-05-09 | vs | Chicago Sky | L | 83 - 98 |
| 2026-05-12 | vs | New York Liberty | W | 98 - 96 |
| 2026-05-14 | vs | New York Liberty | L | 82 - 100 |
| 2026-05-18 | vs | Connecticut Sun | W | 83 - 82 |
| 2026-05-20 | @ | Indiana Fever | L | 73 - 90 |
| 2026-05-23 | @ | Toronto Tempo | W | 99 - 80 |
| 2026-05-25 | @ | New York Liberty | W | 81 - 74 |
| 2026-05-27 | vs | Connecticut Sun | W | 71 - 61 |
| 2026-05-29 | vs | Atlanta Dream | L | 66 - 86 |
| 2026-05-30 | vs | Indiana Fever | W | 100 - 84 |
| 2026-06-02 | @ | Golden State Valkyries | L | 77 - 95 |
| 2026-06-05 | vs | Phoenix Mercury | L | 72 - 78 |
| 2026-06-07 | @ | Los Angeles Sparks | L | 72 - 89 |
| 2026-06-11 | vs | Las Vegas Aces | L | 89 - 105 |
| 2026-06-13 | vs | Dallas Wings | W | 84 - 83 |
| 2026-06-15 | @ | Minnesota Lynx | L | 74 - 107 |
| 2026-06-17 | vs | Seattle Storm | W | 94 - 89 |
| 2026-06-24 | @ | Chicago Sky | L | 78 - 101 |
| 2026-06-26 | @ | Chicago Sky | L | 94 - 124 |
| 2026-06-28 | @ | Washington Mystics | L | 123 - 124 |
| 2026-07-04 | @ | Seattle Storm | W | 77 - 72 |
| 2026-07-09 | vs | Las Vegas Aces | L | 80 - 88 |
| 2026-07-11 | @ | Atlanta Dream | W | 102 - 92 |
| 2026-07-14 | @ | Connecticut Sun | L | 87 - 90 |
| 2026-07-16 | @ | Washington Mystics | W | 75 - 56 |
| 2026-07-18 | @ | Minnesota Lynx | L | 93 - 101 |
| 2026-07-22 | vs | Dallas Wings | L | 97 - 101 |
| 2026-07-28 | @ | Las Vegas Aces | L | 83 - 98 |
| 2026-07-31 | vs | Indiana Fever | L | 98 - 112 |
| 2026-08-02 | vs | Los Angeles Sparks | L | 101 - 106 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Barker
|
G | 1 | 33.0 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 51.8 | 40.0 |
C. Leite
|
G | 2 | 22.0 | 11.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 66.7 | 53.8 | - | 64.9 | 66.7 |
L. Geiselsoder
|
C | 2 | 21.0 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 33.3 | 90.9 | - | 69.4 | 54.5 |
S. Williams
|
- | 2 | 14.5 | 10.5 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 13.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 73.5 | 66.7 |
B. Carleton
|
F | 1 | 25.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 46.1 | 43.8 |
Megan Gustafson
|
C | 1 | 23.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | 50.8 | 50.0 |
N. Puoch
|
F | 2 | 22.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 59.2 | 60.0 |
Haley Jones
|
G | 2 | 24.5 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 41.5 | 37.5 |
J. Harrison
|
- | 2 | 19.5 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 44.8 | 30.8 |
E. Engstler
|
F | 1 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
F. Bühner
|
F | 1 | 21.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 32.2 | 16.7 |
P. Williams
|
- | 1 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | - | 104.2 | 150.0 |
Maya Caldwell
|
G | 1 | 15.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
C. Bibby
|
F | 1 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG