Pomona-Pitzer
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo | 1000 (#271) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 1039 (#214) | - |
| Margin | +2.7 (#138) | HCA +2.5 |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-12 | @ | Pacific (OR) | L | 63 - 64 |
| 2022-11-13 | @ | George Fox | W | 56 - 51 |
| 2022-11-19 | @ | UC Santa Cruz | L | 66 - 79 |
| 2022-11-22 | vs | Whitman | L | 52 - 68 |
| 2022-11-25 | vs | Cabrini | W | 67 - 57 |
| 2022-11-26 | vs | Augsburg | L | 53 - 66 |
| 2022-11-30 | vs | Claremont-M-S | L | 64 - 70 |
| 2022-12-03 | vs | La Verne | L | 60 - 69 |
| 2022-12-06 | vs | Occidental | W | 60 - 49 |
| 2022-12-31 | @ | Cal Lutheran | L | 51 - 65 |
| 2023-01-04 | @ | Chapman | W | 66 - 62 |
| 2023-01-07 | vs | Redlands | L | 65 - 79 |
| 2023-01-14 | @ | Whittier | W | 64 - 55 |
| 2023-01-18 | @ | Caltech | L | 53 - 61 |
| 2023-01-21 | @ | Claremont-M-S | L | 59 - 68 |
| 2023-01-22 | vs | UC Santa Cruz | L | 59 - 78 |
| 2023-01-28 | vs | Whittier | W | 64 - 45 |
| 2023-02-01 | vs | Chapman | L | 62 - 66 |
| 2023-02-04 | @ | Redlands | L | 54 - 75 |
| 2023-02-08 | @ | Occidental | L | 57 - 61 |
| 2023-02-11 | @ | La Verne | W | 88 - 84 |
| 2023-02-15 | vs | Caltech | W | 86 - 42 |
| 2023-02-18 | vs | Cal Lutheran | L | 58 - 60 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles, with four dividers separating the position buckets.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pomona-Pitzer | - | 8 | 200.8 | 66.2 | 34.8 | 16.1 | 8.6 | 3.0 | 16.5 | 58.8 | 53.5 | - | - | - | 43.2 | 35.6 | 67.4 | - | 51.9 | 49.8 |
| Sara Chicco | - | 8 | 23.0 | 12.0 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 9.1 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 49.3 | 44.9 | 100.0 | - | 65.0 | 64.4 |
| Abigail Homan | - | 8 | 30.9 | 11.0 | 7.2 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 9.6 | 11.1 | - | - | - | 46.8 | 53.3 | 80.0 | - | 54.1 | 51.9 |
| Emily Lee | - | 8 | 19.9 | 10.4 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.5 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 32.0 | 58.3 | - | 46.5 | 45.2 |
| Avery Patricco | - | 8 | 19.3 | 7.8 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 6.1 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 26.3 | 78.9 | - | 54.0 | 48.0 |
| Jadyn Lee | - | 8 | 22.2 | 7.6 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 6.9 | 6.5 | - | - | - | 43.6 | 40.0 | 90.0 | - | 51.3 | 47.3 |
| Kayla Malek | - | 8 | 22.2 | 5.5 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 0.0 | 64.0 | - | 53.7 | 46.7 |
| Sofia Robel | - | 8 | 10.9 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 25.0 | - | 58.2 | 60.0 |
| Ali Bennett | - | 4 | 7.1 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 28.6 | 50.0 | - | 50.5 | 50.0 |
| Molly Pieper | - | 8 | 10.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 48.3 | 50.0 |
| Shea Joko | - | 8 | 16.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 26.3 | 16.7 | 50.0 | - | 30.2 | 28.9 |
| Katie Drais | - | 5 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 20.0 | 0 | - | 27.3 | 27.3 |
| Kellie Au | - | 8 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| Anna Revill | - | 5 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Claire Wegmann-Krider | - | 3 | 4.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Elsa Cottrell | - | 7 | 4.6 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| TEAM | - | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG