Pittsburg St.
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1171 (#49) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1254 (#19) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1117 (#55) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +15.8 (#40) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +18.4 (#107) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.889 (#190) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.844 (#162) | NetEff +13.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.984 (#88) | AdjNet +35.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.986 (#86) | AdjNet +36.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.901 (#74) | AdjO 82.2 | AdjD 57.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.752 (#48) | AdjO 73.2 | AdjD 61.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.844 (#64) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.836 (#60) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1212 (#41) | RD 103 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | @ | Northern St. | W | 72 - 70 |
| 2025-11-15 | @ | Minn.-Crookston | W | 82 - 78 |
| 2025-11-20 | @ | Northwestern Okla. | W | 68 - 64 |
| 2025-11-25 | vs | Texas Woman's | L | 62 - 87 |
| 2025-11-30 | vs | Angelo St. | W | 66 - 46 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | Central Okla. | W | 62 - 59 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Rogers St. | W | 73 - 51 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Fort Hays St. | L | 70 - 88 |
| 2025-12-15 | vs | St. Mary (KS) | W | 86 - 43 |
| 2025-12-19 | @ | Cameron | W | 73 - 51 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Western Colo. | W | 70 - 67 |
| 2026-01-01 | @ | Ark.-Fort Smith | W | 79 - 56 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Northeastern St. | W | 67 - 58 |
| 2026-01-14 | @ | Rogers St. | W | 68 - 57 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Central Okla. | W | 84 - 56 |
| 2026-01-28 | vs | Northeastern St. | L | 76 - 80 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Ark.-Fort Smith | W | 68 - 58 |
| 2026-02-02 | vs | Mo. Southern St. | W | 72 - 66 |
| 2026-02-05 | @ | Emporia St. | L | 63 - 65 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Newman | W | 81 - 76 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Adams | - | 20 | 31.0 | 13.1 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 10.7 | 8.2 | 143 | 6.5 | 26.7 | 39.7 | 27.4 | 88.9 | -0.14 | 52.5 | 44.4 |
| Harper Schreiner | - | 20 | 34.2 | 12.6 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 10.2 | 11.4 | 82 | 3.7 | 14.0 | 40.7 | 32.4 | 82.9 | 1.28 | 52.9 | 46.1 |
| Ja'Miya Brown | - | 18 | 25.0 | 12.6 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 6.8 | 67 | 3.4 | 21.5 | 44.5 | 37.8 | 75.8 | -0.44 | 55.0 | 52.6 |
| Kaycee McCumber | - | 20 | 24.6 | 9.3 | 10.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 6.3 | 13.8 | 31 | 1.4 | 6.3 | 49.2 | 0 | 76.5 | 0.79 | 57.5 | 49.2 |
| Clara Swearingen | - | 20 | 30.3 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 8.6 | 3.2 | 109 | 4.7 | 19.6 | 31.6 | 26.7 | 65.9 | -0.68 | 43.1 | 39.5 |
| Cambrie Phillips | - | 20 | 16.7 | 5.1 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 77 | 3.5 | 25.5 | 30.0 | 34.8 | 71.4 | 0.86 | 41.7 | 37.3 |
| Amanda Byrnes | - | 18 | 12.7 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 111 | 5.5 | 81.3 | 57.4 | 0 | 69.0 | -0.62 | 61.4 | 57.4 |
| Hannah Miller | - | 20 | 14.3 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 4.3 | 1.2 | -83 | -1.8 | -18.7 | 40.2 | 11.1 | 78.3 | -5.95 | 45.8 | 40.8 |
| Marie Wembadjonga | - | 16 | 8.1 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 8 | 0.5 | 15.2 | 68.8 | 0 | 55.0 | -1.67 | 66.5 | 68.8 |
| Karolina Kiraga | - | 12 | 10.4 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 82 | 5.9 | 51.9 | 58.3 | 33.3 | 57.1 | -0.36 | 63.3 | 62.5 |
| Ashlyn Yow | - | 13 | 11.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 0.3 | -6 | -0.4 | -20.8 | 34.5 | 23.5 | 0 | -1.62 | 41.4 | 41.4 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG