Pitt.-Johnstown
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 930 (#294) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 954 (#216) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -7.2 (#270) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.203 (#488) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.139 (#324) | NetEff -14.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.305 (#470) | AdjNet -7.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.299 (#472) | AdjNet -7.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.414 (#458) | AdjO 63.4 | AdjD 67.2 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | @ | Binghamton | L | 34 - 79 |
| 2024-11-08 | vs | West Va. Wesleyan | L | 69 - 73 |
| 2024-11-09 | @ | Frostburg St. | L | 59 - 63 |
| 2024-11-13 | vs | Wheeling | L | 50 - 65 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Davis & Elkins | W | 82 - 68 |
| 2024-11-18 | vs | Saginaw Valley | L | 55 - 65 |
| 2024-11-22 | vs | Lock Haven | L | 54 - 73 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Mansfield | L | 60 - 61 |
| 2024-12-02 | @ | Glenville St. | L | 49 - 87 |
| 2024-12-06 | @ | Shippensburg | L | 59 - 74 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Millersville | L | 38 - 76 |
| 2024-12-14 | @ | Colgate | L | 46 - 71 |
| 2024-12-17 | vs | West Chester | L | 64 - 71 |
| 2024-12-21 | @ | Shepherd | L | 57 - 64 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | West Virginia St. | W | 81 - 80 |
| 2025-01-06 | @ | Slippery Rock | L | 58 - 71 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Edinboro | L | 36 - 87 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Clarion | L | 63 - 80 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Indiana (PA) | L | 62 - 84 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | California (PA) | L | 52 - 70 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Gannon | L | 41 - 66 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Seton Hill | L | 67 - 76 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Clarion | L | 51 - 63 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Edinboro | L | 55 - 79 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Indiana (PA) | L | 67 - 79 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Slippery Rock | W | 69 - 67 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | California (PA) | L | 43 - 89 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Gannon | L | 41 - 76 |
| 2025-02-26 | @ | Seton Hill | L | 61 - 78 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belle Bosch | - | 27 | 29.7 | 13.9 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 12.4 | 8.1 | -47 | -1.3 | -1.4 | 42.4 | 16.3 | 74.3 | -0.03 | 48.9 | 43.6 |
| Riley Childress | - | 29 | 33.4 | 8.1 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 4.1 | 7.6 | 6.0 | -182 | -4.5 | -4.4 | 36.2 | 27.5 | 73.3 | -0.45 | 46.1 | 40.5 |
| Lexi Margolis | - | 29 | 28.0 | 6.7 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 8.1 | 2.2 | -149 | -3.7 | -4.8 | 29.8 | 27.7 | 76.0 | -1.16 | 39.6 | 37.4 |
| M'laya Ainsworth | - | 29 | 27.1 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 6.7 | 5.2 | -143 | -3.6 | -4.9 | 43.6 | 26.9 | 55.0 | -0.2 | 47.8 | 47.2 |
| Liv West | - | 16 | 19.1 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 4.8 | 4.7 | -38 | -1.7 | -2.4 | 45.5 | 46.2 | 76.0 | 0.26 | 54.0 | 49.4 |
| Camille Dominick | - | 29 | 20.4 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 6.6 | 1.1 | -213 | -5.6 | -7.8 | 28.1 | 18.2 | 70.2 | -1.02 | 35.0 | 30.2 |
| Sophia Ott | - | 28 | 11.9 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 2.7 | -65 | -1.7 | -3.7 | 40.7 | 40.7 | 61.9 | -0.42 | 46.9 | 45.1 |
| Lydia Miller | - | 24 | 16.8 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 3.6 | -74 | -2.3 | -4.1 | 31.9 | 21.4 | 66.7 | 0.14 | 39.4 | 35.2 |
| Gianna Gallucci | - | 29 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 34.1 | 25.0 | 88.9 | - | 44.5 | 39.0 |
| Hayden Keith | - | 27 | 13.9 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 0.4 | -90 | -2.8 | -5.7 | 27.7 | 31.7 | 75.0 | -0.44 | 40.1 | 39.2 |
| Kate Myers | - | 29 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | -40 | -1.2 | -6.5 | 40.9 | 35.3 | 100.0 | -0.14 | 57.9 | 54.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG