Park University Gilbert Buccaneers
Also known as: Park University Gilbert Buccaneers
Program History
2024 Team Stats (1 games)
39.0
PPG
90.0
Opp
-51.0
Margin
25.4%
FG%
20.0%
3P%
55.6%
FT%
31.0
RPG
6.0
APG
15.0
TO
78.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 998 (#279) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -1.1 (#376) | HCA +2.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.494 (#264) | AdjO 72.9 | AdjD 73.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.492 (#351) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.484 (#339) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 929 (#376) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | @ | Weber State Wildcats | L | 39 - 90 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Shorts
|
- | 1 | 18.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 80.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | - | 82.7 | 90.0 |
C. Ivy
|
- | 1 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 25.0 | 75.0 | - | 45.7 | 35.7 |
M. Mckinzy
|
G | 1 | 24.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 50.8 | 42.9 |
A. Moreno
|
F | 1 | 21.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
L. Ballard
|
- | 1 | 21.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 14.3 | 14.3 |
T. Banks
|
F | 1 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | -5.0 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 14.3 | 14.3 |
D. Gadashev
|
- | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
D. Frye
|
- | 1 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 14.3 | 14.3 |
E. Hoosier
|
- | 1 | 21.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | -4.0 | - | - | - | 11.1 | 0 | 0 | - | 11.1 | 11.1 |
T. Ward
|
- | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -2.0 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
D. Majak
|
- | 1 | 17.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Cosby
|
- | 1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG