Pacific Tigers
2023 Team Stats (5 games)
66.8
PPG
80.0
Opp
-13.2
Margin
39.3%
FG%
32.4%
3P%
71.6%
FT%
35.0
RPG
11.4
APG
15.8
TO
85.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 957 (#289) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1023 (#216) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +13.9 (#231) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.394 (#217) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-11 | vs | Stanford Cardinal | L | 44 - 98 |
| 2023-01-19 | vs | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 78 - 81 |
| 2023-02-16 | @ | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 58 - 69 |
| 2023-03-03 | vs | Saint Mary's Gaels | W | 82 - 77 |
| 2023-03-06 | @ | Portland Pilots | L | 72 - 75 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Smith
|
G | 5 | 34.4 | 16.6 | 4.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 11.6 | 8.8 | - | - | - | 43.1 | 40.6 | 76.9 | - | 59.8 | 54.3 |
C. Holmberg
|
F | 5 | 21.4 | 9.8 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 8.8 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 46.7 | 100.0 | - | 54.6 | 53.4 |
S. Ashby
|
G | 5 | 29.8 | 9.2 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 11.8 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 25.4 | 25.8 | 100.0 | - | 36.8 | 32.2 |
E. Elliott
|
C | 5 | 24.6 | 9.0 | 6.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 8.4 | 7.2 | - | - | - | 47.6 | 0 | 35.7 | - | 46.7 | 47.6 |
A. James
|
G | 5 | 25.0 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 9.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 27.7 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 33.8 | 30.9 |
R. Schweizer
|
F | 5 | 10.0 | 5.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 51.3 | 50.0 |
K. Deaton
|
G | 5 | 15.0 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 56.2 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 56.3 | 56.2 |
D. Richardson
|
G | 4 | 11.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 66.7 | 100.0 | - | 76.1 | 71.4 |
M. Ennis
|
F | 5 | 18.6 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 55.1 | 50.0 |
E. Adams
|
G | 3 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 3.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 11.1 | 20.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
S. Ward
|
G | 4 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
C. Johnson
|
C | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG