Oregon Tech
Also known as: Oregon Tech
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.373 (#414) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.456 (#422) | AdjNet -1.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.462 (#425) | AdjNet -1.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.474 (#430) | AdjO 65.0 | AdjD 66.2 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-09 | @ | Western Ore. | L | 65 - 68 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Sprague | - | 1 | 33.0 | 24.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 15.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 66.4 | 56.7 |
| Alexis Elquist | - | 1 | 23.0 | 12.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Gabbie Gascon | - | 1 | 36.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 16.7 | 100.0 | - | 38.3 | 25.0 |
| Tatum Schmerbach | - | 1 | 27.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 43.8 | 43.8 |
| Elli Kent | - | 1 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 42.5 | 30.0 |
| Kayley Elliott | - | 1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Kaitlin Wright | - | 1 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -1.0 | -55 | -5.0 | -13.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.18 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Jozie Ramos | - | 1 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 25.8 | 0.0 |
| Kennedy Tull | - | 1 | 27.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 10.2 | 0.0 |
| Jenna Wallace | - | 1 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 40 | 3.3 | 7.6 | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.49 | 34.7 | 0.0 |
| Chelsea Ching | - | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Kendall Fealey | - | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Kate Miles | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Lily Everson | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG