Oregon Ducks
2023 Team Stats (18 games)
76.4
PPG
63.1
Opp
+14.5
Margin
42.9%
FG%
38.0%
3P%
71.3%
FT%
43.1
RPG
16.8
APG
11.4
TO
84.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1142 (#100) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1325 (#32) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +43.6 (#29) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.834 (#61) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-07 | vs | Northwestern Wildcats | W | 100 - 57 |
| 2022-11-12 | vs | Seattle U Redhawks | W | 90 - 47 |
| 2022-11-21 | vs | Southern Utah Thunderbirds | W | 66 - 54 |
| 2022-11-24 | vs | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 79 - 85 |
| 2022-12-03 | vs | Portland Pilots | W | 90 - 51 |
| 2022-12-11 | vs | Oregon State Beavers | W | 75 - 67 |
| 2022-12-15 | vs | Eastern Washington Eagles | W | 88 - 38 |
| 2022-12-18 | vs | Charleston Cougars | W | 97 - 33 |
| 2022-12-30 | vs | UCLA Bruins | L | 74 - 82 |
| 2023-01-01 | vs | USC Trojans | W | 73 - 45 |
| 2023-01-06 | @ | Arizona State Sun Devils | W | 82 - 62 |
| 2023-01-08 | @ | Arizona Wildcats | L | 71 - 79 |
| 2023-01-13 | vs | Washington Huskies | W | 65 - 58 |
| 2023-01-15 | vs | Washington State Cougars | L | 84 - 85 |
| 2023-01-20 | @ | Oregon State Beavers | L | 65 - 68 |
| 2023-01-29 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 54 - 62 |
| 2023-02-05 | vs | Utah Utes | L | 92 - 100 |
| 2023-02-12 | @ | UCLA Bruins | L | 57 - 67 |
| 2023-02-23 | vs | Arizona Wildcats | W | 73 - 59 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. Rogers
|
G | 18 | 32.6 | 16.9 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 13.0 | 11.9 | - | - | - | 48.7 | 44.0 | 78.6 | - | 59.0 | 55.8 |
G. VanSlooten
|
F | 17 | 28.9 | 13.2 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 11.5 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 42.6 | 0.0 | 65.6 | - | 48.0 | 42.6 |
C. Gray
|
G | 18 | 30.3 | 12.0 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 11.2 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 37.8 | 39.2 | 96.0 | - | 50.9 | 47.8 |
T. Paopao
|
- | 18 | 32.3 | 11.6 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 11.2 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 38.6 | 36.0 | 87.0 | - | 49.0 | 46.5 |
T. Hanson
|
G | 18 | 18.4 | 7.6 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 6.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 46.2 | 83.3 | - | 60.0 | 58.3 |
P. Kyei
|
C | 18 | 24.6 | 7.2 | 11.4 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 5.6 | 14.6 | - | - | - | 55.0 | 0 | 51.4 | - | 55.5 | 55.0 |
J. Isai
|
G | 7 | 19.0 | 6.1 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 4.4 | 7.1 | - | - | - | 51.6 | 31.2 | 60.0 | - | 60.7 | 59.7 |
A. Hurst
|
G | 15 | 15.1 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 4.8 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 23.6 | 21.3 | 77.8 | - | 33.6 | 30.6 |
T. Hosendove
|
F | 18 | 12.2 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 54.8 | 0 | 65.2 | - | 59.6 | 54.8 |
K. Basham
|
C | 9 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 62.5 | - | 48.1 | 40.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG