Oregon Ducks
2020 Team Stats (17 games)
88.6
PPG
57.2
Opp
+31.4
Margin
51.5%
FG%
38.2%
3P%
78.0%
FT%
41.4
RPG
22.2
APG
11.9
TO
84.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1257 (#60) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1464 (#13) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +55.3 (#5) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.964 (#22) | - |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | vs | Northeastern Huskies | W | 89 - 47 |
| 2019-11-13 | vs | Utah State Aggies | W | 109 - 52 |
| 2019-11-16 | vs | Texas Southern Tigers | W | 99 - 63 |
| 2019-11-28 | vs | Oklahoma State Cowgirls | W | 89 - 72 |
| 2019-11-30 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | L | 62 - 72 |
| 2019-12-08 | vs | South Dakota State Jackrabbits | W | 95 - 56 |
| 2019-12-14 | @ | Long Beach State Beach | W | 81 - 45 |
| 2019-12-16 | vs | UC Riverside Highlanders | W | 84 - 41 |
| 2019-12-21 | vs | Kansas State Wildcats | W | 89 - 51 |
| 2020-01-03 | vs | Colorado Buffaloes | W | 104 - 46 |
| 2020-01-05 | vs | Utah Utes | W | 88 - 51 |
| 2020-01-10 | @ | Arizona State Sun Devils | L | 66 - 72 |
| 2020-01-12 | @ | Arizona Wildcats | W | 71 - 64 |
| 2020-01-19 | vs | California Golden Bears | W | 105 - 55 |
| 2020-01-30 | @ | Utah Utes | W | 90 - 63 |
| 2020-02-16 | @ | USC Trojans | W | 93 - 67 |
| 2020-03-01 | vs | Washington Huskies | W | 92 - 56 |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruthy Hebard
|
- | 17 | 27.7 | 18.2 | 9.7 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 11.6 | 18.8 | - | - | - | 70.2 | 0 | 63.3 | 2.88 | 70.4 | 70.2 |
Satou Sabally
|
- | 13 | 26.5 | 16.1 | 6.4 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 10.4 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 51.1 | 34.6 | 81.5 | 2.6 | 63.9 | 57.8 |
S. Ionescu
|
- | 17 | 32.2 | 15.7 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 12.1 | 20.4 | - | - | - | 49.3 | 33.3 | 97.5 | 0.99 | 60.0 | 55.6 |
E. Boley
|
F | 17 | 23.0 | 9.2 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 7.8 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 39.8 | 62.5 | 0.63 | 57.1 | 56.8 |
M. Moore
|
G | 17 | 24.9 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 6.4 | 10.1 | - | - | - | 45.4 | 30.0 | 75.0 | 2.11 | 54.1 | 49.5 |
J. Shelley
|
G | 17 | 18.8 | 7.9 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 202 | 7.5 | 35.0 | 43.1 | 44.9 | 76.2 | 2.11 | 60.7 | 58.3 |
T. Chavez
|
G | 16 | 18.9 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 5.1 | - | - | - | 54.3 | 46.5 | 80.0 | 1.74 | 69.3 | 68.6 |
H. Winterburn
|
G | 16 | 13.9 | 5.1 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 4.6 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 39.7 | 36.4 | 80.0 | 2.12 | 51.5 | 47.9 |
L. Giomi
|
F | 17 | 12.3 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 59.6 | 0 | 73.7 | 2.63 | 63.0 | 59.6 |
L. Cochrane
|
F | 12 | 7.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 3.4 | -30 | -3.3 | -32.7 | 61.5 | 0 | 83.3 | 0.13 | 67.1 | 61.5 |
M. Yaeger
|
G | 11 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 35.0 | 27.3 | 0 | 0.32 | 42.5 | 42.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG