Ohio
2026-2027 Team Stats (2 games)
62.5
PPG
45.0
Opp
+17.5
Margin
34.5%
FG%
19.3%
3P%
65.5%
FT%
43.5
RPG
11.5
APG
21.5
TO
75.6
Est. poss./game
57.2
Adj PPG
58.2
Adj Opp PPG
#146
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2026-2027
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1065 (#126) | Preseason prior 1058 (returning production + recruiting): last season 995, returning +132, transfers -68, freshmen +0 |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1046 (#125) | HCA +169 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1045 (#124) | HCA +169 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +5.2 (#122) | HCA +1.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +5.2 (#120) | HCA +1.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.674 (#116) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.564 (#138) | AdjNet +3.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.577 (#137) | AdjNet +3.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.543 (#146) | AdjO 57.2 | AdjD 58.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.542 (#146) | AdjO 57.3 | AdjD 58.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.589 (#127) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.589 (#127) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1052 (#129) | RD 222 | GP 1 |
| Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.586 (#126) | Chronological component blend with rest and venue. |
Rank through the season
League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.
Recency Ensemble
Log Adjusted
Elo
Points Off/Def Recency
2026-2027 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | vs | UL Monroe Warhawks | W | 57 - 46 |
| 2026-11-09 | vs | Otterbein Cardinals | W | 68 - 44 |
| 2026-11-14 | vs | Georgia Lady Bulldogs | - | Incomplete score |
| 2026-11-18 | @ | Howard Bison | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-21 | vs | Xavier Musketeers | - | Preview |
2026-2027 Roster
Estimated Minutes by Position
Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monica Williams
|
G | 2 | 28.5 | 14.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 11 | 1 | 11.0 | 12.2 | 37.5 | 30.0 | 66.7 | -0.61 | 49.5 | 43.8 |
Sienna Allen
|
G | 1 | 15.0 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 104.2 | 100.0 |
A. Jennings
|
G | 1 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 15.0 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | 43.0 | 38.9 |
Danni Scully
|
F | 2 | 18.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 6.5 | -4 | 1 | -4.0 | -8.8 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 60.0 | -3.15 | 48.6 | 40.0 |
Asiah Baxter
|
G | 2 | 19.5 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 12 | 1 | 12.0 | 22.0 | 35.7 | 22.2 | 50.0 | 0.68 | 43.7 | 42.9 |
Gigi Bower
|
G | 2 | 17.5 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 8 | 1 | 8.0 | 16.2 | 44.4 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.63 | 60.4 | 61.1 |
Antonicia Moultrie
|
G | 2 | 26.5 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 5 | 1 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 71.4 | -1.02 | 42.0 | 30.0 |
Bailey Tabeling
|
G | 2 | 26.5 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 9.0 | -0.5 | 14 | 1 | 14.0 | 17.4 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 2.04 | 27.8 | 22.2 |
Kamie Ellis
|
G | 2 | 23.5 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 10.5 | 3 | 1 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 37.5 | 40.0 | 100.0 | -1.53 | 56.3 | 50.0 |
Madison Lim
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 53.2 | 0.0 |
Irene Asensio
|
G | 2 | 17.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | -1.5 | 6 | 1 | 6.0 | 15.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.12 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Aubrey Pepper
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Blossom Wallace
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cassidy Lafler
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Vivienne Macheck
|
G | 1 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Bella Ranallo
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2026-2027 Shot Zones
113 located field-goal attempts in 2 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Monica WilliamsAsiah BaxterGigi BowerBailey TabelingKamie EllisA. JenningsAntonicia Moultrie
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 14-26 | 53.8 | 28 | Bailey Tabeling 21% (6 pts) | Antonicia Moultrie 14% (4 pts) | Monica Williams 50% (6 misses) | Danni Scully 17% (2 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 13-26 | 50.0 | 26 | Monica Williams 31% (8 pts) | A. Jennings 15% (4 pts) | Antonicia Moultrie 23% (3 misses) | A. Jennings 15% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 1-3 | 33.3 | 2 | Monica Williams 100% (2 pts) | - | A. Jennings 50% (1 misses) | Monica Williams 50% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 0-0 | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Mid-range right | 0-1 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Gigi Bower 100% (1 misses) | - |
| Left corner 3 | 1-6 | 16.7 | 3 | Gigi Bower 100% (3 pts) | - | Antonicia Moultrie 40% (2 misses) | Bailey Tabeling 20% (1 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 1-3 | 33.3 | 3 | Kamie Ellis 100% (3 pts) | - | Asiah Baxter 100% (2 misses) | - |
| Above-break 3 left | 4-24 | 16.7 | 12 | Monica Williams 50% (6 pts) | A. Jennings 25% (3 pts) | Monica Williams 20% (4 misses) | Asiah Baxter 15% (3 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 1-6 | 16.7 | 3 | Gigi Bower 100% (3 pts) | - | A. Jennings 20% (1 misses) | Asiah Baxter 20% (1 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 4-18 | 22.2 | 12 | Asiah Baxter 25% (3 pts) | Gigi Bower 25% (3 pts) | Bailey Tabeling 50% (7 misses) | Danni Scully 14% (2 misses) |