Notre Dame
2020 Team Stats (6 games)
70.7
PPG
71.9
Opp
+0.0
Margin
40.7%
FG%
33.1%
3P%
76.8%
FT%
34.8
RPG
15.3
APG
11.5
TO
80.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1213 (#152) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1371 (#75) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +31.2 (#88) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.318 (#66) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.318 (#53) | NetEff -6.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.412 (#72) | AdjNet -3.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.411 (#72) | AdjNet -3.1 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | @ | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 65 - 76 |
| 2019-11-12 | vs | Howard Bison | W | 79 - 50 |
| 2020-01-11 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | L | 64 - 67 |
| 2020-01-25 | @ | Florida State Seminoles | L | 84 - 85 |
| 2020-02-15 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 60 - 94 |
| 2020-03-04 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 71 - 73 |
| 2020-03-11 | vs | Boston College Eagles | W | 80 - 58 |
| 2020-03-12 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | - | Preview |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. Hubb
|
G | 6 | 36.7 | 16.3 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 13.2 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 41.8 | 42.3 | 83.3 | - | 58.1 | 55.7 |
J. Mooney
|
F | 6 | 31.5 | 14.0 | 10.5 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 13.3 | 12.7 | - | - | - | 46.2 | 27.8 | 45.5 | - | 49.5 | 49.4 |
T. Gibbs
|
G | 6 | 34.8 | 11.0 | 1.8 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 9.3 | 6.7 | - | - | - | 39.3 | 30.4 | 83.3 | - | 51.6 | 45.5 |
Dane Goodwin
|
- | 7 | 26.1 | 10.4 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 7.1 | 8.9 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 36.7 | 84.6 | 0.21 | 65.5 | 51.0 |
J. Durham
|
F | 6 | 16.8 | 9.8 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 9.7 | - | - | - | 56.4 | 0 | 83.3 | - | 62.9 | 56.4 |
Robby Carmody
|
G | 1 | 17.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
E. Morgan
|
- | 1 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 86.8 | 75.0 |
N. Laszewski
|
- | 7 | 19.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 26.7 | 22.2 | 66.7 | - | 47.5 | 33.3 |
R. Pflueger
|
G | 6 | 27.3 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 24.1 | 26.3 | 50.0 | - | 33.5 | 32.8 |
N. Djogo
|
G | 4 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Doherty
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG