Notre Dame Fighting Irish
2023 Team Stats (29 games)
74.7
PPG
58.2
Opp
+16.9
Margin
45.7%
FG%
30.3%
3P%
70.7%
FT%
43.8
RPG
16.6
APG
15.7
TO
85.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1148 (#96) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1294 (#43) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +53.4 (#7) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.967 (#7) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Citron
|
- | 29 | 33.5 | 15.0 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 11.1 | 11.7 | - | - | - | 47.2 | 39.8 | 75.7 | - | 58.2 | 53.9 |
O. Miles
|
G | 25 | 31.9 | 13.9 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 11.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 45.3 | 22.9 | 77.1 | - | 54.0 | 48.2 |
M. Westbeld
|
- | 29 | 27.5 | 11.1 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 44.5 | 33.3 | 61.4 | - | 50.6 | 49.0 |
L. Ebo
|
C | 24 | 21.3 | 9.4 | 7.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 6.6 | 11.2 | - | - | - | 52.2 | 0.0 | 74.1 | - | 58.1 | 52.2 |
D. Mabrey
|
G | 15 | 28.9 | 9.0 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 9.7 | 4.4 | - | - | - | 30.3 | 27.7 | 80.8 | - | 43.1 | 39.3 |
KK Bransford
|
G | 29 | 24.0 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 6.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 12.5 | 72.6 | - | 56.3 | 50.3 |
K. Watson
|
F | 29 | 23.5 | 6.9 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 4.8 | 7.1 | - | - | - | 60.9 | 0 | 51.6 | - | 60.5 | 60.9 |
C. Prosper
|
G | 21 | 21.7 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 5.9 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 23.3 | 63.6 | - | 41.1 | 37.4 |
N. Marshall
|
F | 24 | 10.9 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 50.9 | 0 | 65.8 | - | 56.3 | 50.9 |
J. Brown
|
G | 24 | 8.0 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 40.5 | 37.5 | 78.3 | - | 54.1 | 44.6 |
T. Cha
|
G | 4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
S. Cernugel
|
G | 12 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 14.3 | 14.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG