🐻⬇️🏀

Notre Dame (MD)

Also known as: Notre Dame (MD)
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1023 (#277) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 993 (#343) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 996 (#467) HCA +62 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More → -10.7 (#316) HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → -7.7 (#464) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.586 (#416) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -3.7 More → 0.364 (#400) NetEff -3.7
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -25.4 More → 0.051 (#601) AdjNet -25.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -26.4 More → 0.041 (#607) AdjNet -26.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 51.8 | AdjD 67.5 More → 0.194 (#591) AdjO 51.8 | AdjD 67.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 54.8 | AdjD 55.8 More → 0.477 (#421) AdjO 54.8 | AdjD 55.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.375 (#476) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.398 (#458) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 104 | GP 21 More → 1016 (#281) RD 104 | GP 21

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-08 @ Alvernia - Incomplete score
2025-11-10 @ Randolph-Macon - Incomplete score
2025-11-13 @ Washington Col. - Incomplete score
2025-11-15 vs East. Mennonite - Incomplete score
2025-11-19 @ McDaniel - Incomplete score
2025-12-03 @ FDU-Florham - Incomplete score
2025-12-13 @ Baruch - Incomplete score
2025-12-30 @ UMBC - Incomplete score
2025-12-31 @ Goucher - Incomplete score
2026-01-13 vs Penn St. Harrisburg - Incomplete score
2026-01-14 vs Salisbury - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 vs Penn St. Brandywine - Incomplete score
2026-01-21 vs Wilson - Incomplete score
2026-01-24 @ Keystone - Incomplete score
2026-01-28 vs Cairn - Incomplete score
2026-01-31 @ Penn St.-Abington - Incomplete score
2026-02-04 vs St. Mary's (MD) - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 vs Penn St.-Berks - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Amani Watts - 17 23.8 12.4 8.4 1.2 0.9 0.4 1.4 8.5 13.4 128 6.1 30.1 51.0 0 66.7 2.09 56.5 51.0
Marerica Barnett - 1 35.0 12.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 14.0 1.0 -12 -12.0 -13.0 28.6 20.0 40.0 -0.85 37.0 35.7
Marecia Barnett - 16 26.8 8.9 4.7 2.4 2.0 0.1 2.9 11.9 3.4 96 5.1 22.9 28.4 26.6 75.0 0.5 36.9 36.1
Raina Burns - 17 22.8 7.5 2.6 1.9 1.2 0.1 2.7 7.4 3.2 114 5.7 31.2 33.6 22.7 73.3 -1.89 43.9 37.6
Madison Simmons - 17 26.3 7.3 4.0 2.5 2.2 0.0 2.9 6.6 6.5 128 5.8 26.3 36.6 23.1 59.0 2.85 44.7 39.3
Thalia Kayiranga - 16 12.2 4.8 4.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.1 4.6 5.3 24 1.3 14.6 42.5 0.0 62.5 1.21 46.1 42.5
Allison Holman - 17 18.3 4.4 3.6 1.2 1.1 0.0 1.3 4.5 4.5 40 1.8 9.9 39.5 0 58.3 -1.81 42.7 39.5
Alia Austin - 14 12.9 4.2 2.9 0.6 1.0 0.3 1.1 4.9 2.9 -21 -1.2 -12.8 34.8 0.0 73.3 -3.49 39.0 34.8
Yasmeen Yussuf - 17 24.2 3.2 3.2 1.5 1.6 0.1 1.5 3.2 4.9 123 5.6 32.3 37.0 0 50.0 1.25 40.7 37.0
Regina Sabirova - 12 9.7 3.1 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.0 1.1 3.7 0.2 42 2.6 32.5 31.8 26.1 60.0 1.02 40.0 38.6
Aaliyah Conteh - 17 11.4 2.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.8 2.5 0.7 25 1.2 11.9 32.6 26.1 66.7 -3.14 42.6 39.5
Maya Barnett - 10 8.1 1.9 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.6 2.4 2.3 47 3.9 53.8 25.0 0.0 70.0 3.17 33.5 25.0
Kathryn DeGrange - 5 5.5 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 1.4 1.8 27 4.5 57.0 42.9 0 0 -1.71 42.9 42.9
Jadyn Forbes - 8 6.5 1.0 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.2 2.1 -0.5 18 1.6 26.3 17.6 14.3 0 -1.15 23.5 23.5
Tristian Savage - 11 6.1 0.9 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.0 1.0 1.6 -0.5 8 0.6 10.0 22.2 0.0 33.3 -1.37 24.2 22.2
Raven Rowe - 9 5.8 0.7 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.3 13 1.2 26.7 18.2 0 100.0 -0.84 25.3 18.2

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG