Newman
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 873 (#467) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 917 (#409) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 840 (#663) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.6 (#217) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +1.1 (#350) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.086 (#544) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.546 (#264) | NetEff +1.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.222 (#508) | AdjNet -10.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.230 (#506) | AdjNet -10.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.352 (#508) | AdjO 60.5 | AdjD 67.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.435 (#489) | AdjO 63.0 | AdjD 65.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.426 (#424) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.417 (#433) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 860 (#421) | RD 100 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Southern Ark. | L | 68 - 86 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Ark.-Monticello | L | 54 - 61 |
| 2025-11-18 | vs | Okla. Christian | W | 66 - 64 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | William Jewell | W | 65 - 54 |
| 2025-11-22 | vs | Eastern N.M. | L | 54 - 89 |
| 2025-11-24 | vs | Cent. Christian (KS) | W | 94 - 43 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | Northeastern St. | L | 49 - 74 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Ark.-Fort Smith | W | 77 - 60 |
| 2025-12-13 | vs | Kansas Christian | W | 98 - 42 |
| 2025-12-16 | vs | McPherson | W | 90 - 54 |
| 2026-01-01 | vs | Rogers St. | L | 53 - 62 |
| 2026-01-03 | vs | Central Okla. | L | 55 - 73 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Mo. Southern St. | L | 63 - 71 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Central Mo. | L | 54 - 64 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Washburn | L | 55 - 69 |
| 2026-01-22 | @ | Ark.-Fort Smith | L | 53 - 72 |
| 2026-01-23 | @ | Northeastern St. | L | 72 - 88 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | Central Okla. | L | 51 - 67 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Rogers St. | L | 58 - 65 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Mo. Southern St. | L | 51 - 72 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Pittsburg St. | L | 76 - 81 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaeden McMillin | - | 17 | 26.7 | 14.9 | 6.5 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 13.7 | 8.8 | -2 | -0.1 | -0.5 | 41.2 | 22.5 | 85.2 | -2.15 | 48.7 | 43.1 |
| Alexis Martin | - | 21 | 19.6 | 12.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 9.6 | 5.4 | 23 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 40.8 | 38.5 | 75.4 | 0.63 | 55.7 | 52.0 |
| Paige Craft | - | 19 | 28.2 | 8.4 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 9.4 | 3.2 | -102 | -5.1 | -20.2 | 36.3 | 25.0 | 81.2 | -1.72 | 42.7 | 40.8 |
| Carli Carlson | - | 21 | 18.5 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 7.1 | 3.8 | -77 | -3.5 | -18.0 | 30.9 | 27.3 | 88.9 | -1.59 | 42.5 | 40.9 |
| Valeriya Lioukina | - | 21 | 18.1 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 5.4 | 5.3 | -38 | -1.7 | -8.7 | 35.1 | 0.0 | 62.0 | -2.07 | 40.8 | 35.1 |
| Jolene Ramiro | - | 8 | 15.3 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 10 | 1.4 | 6.2 | 42.9 | 34.8 | 100.0 | 1.91 | 55.7 | 54.3 |
| Monica Redondo | - | 21 | 24.2 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 4.4 | -66 | -3.0 | -10.5 | 28.4 | 30.3 | 77.3 | -1.19 | 43.9 | 39.7 |
| Dani Williams | - | 20 | 13.2 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 9 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 34.6 | 32.1 | 72.2 | -2.02 | 43.9 | 40.1 |
| Delainey Wylie | - | 21 | 16.4 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 6.0 | -59 | -2.7 | -17.1 | 32.9 | 30.2 | 66.7 | 0.04 | 45.6 | 43.0 |
| Caitlynn Clark | - | 5 | 6.5 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 2.6 | -4 | -1.0 | -6.4 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 100.0 | -0.89 | 95.7 | 93.8 |
| Charlize Williams | - | 17 | 10.4 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 28 | 1.6 | 16.1 | 39.3 | 28.6 | 42.9 | -1.29 | 41.8 | 41.1 |
| Shishawna Begay | - | 8 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 14 | 1.6 | 123.5 | 50.0 | 37.5 | 100.0 | -0.1 | 65.9 | 59.4 |
| Amaya Perez | - | 21 | 23.3 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 2.7 | -95 | -4.5 | -17.9 | 33.9 | 20.0 | 63.6 | -3.13 | 39.2 | 36.4 |
| Kyndal Underwood | - | 7 | 7.8 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 11 | 1.4 | 84.1 | 35.3 | 50.0 | 12.5 | -0.08 | 34.1 | 38.2 |
| Mackenzie Burkhart | - | 2 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG