🐻⬇️🏀

New Mexico

Also known as: New Mexico
Program History

2016 Team Stats (4 games)

65.5
PPG
76.0
Opp
-5.8
Margin
40.1%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
81.0%
FT%
32.5
RPG
10.0
APG
15.5
TO
79.0
Pace

Model Outputs

2015-2016
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1590 (#37) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1348 (#108) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → +30.9 (#85) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.103 (#95) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -18.9 More → 0.101 (#101) AdjNet -18.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -18.8 More → 0.102 (#100) AdjNet -18.8

2016 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2015-11-15 @ New Mexico State Aggies W 83 - 74
2015-12-05 @ Purdue Boilermakers L 58 - 70
2015-12-19 vs Rice Owls L 89 - 90
2015-12-25 @ Washington State Cougars L 59 - 82
2016-03-10 vs Nevada Wolf Pack L 62 - 64

2016 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
E. Brown E. Brown G 5 34.4 22.8 5.8 2.2 1.0 0.0 4.4 11.6 15.8 - - - 41.4 37.5 90.0 0.47 75.4 49.1
T. Williams T. Williams F 5 30.8 12.4 5.8 1.0 0.6 1.4 1.0 8.6 11.6 41 2.7 3.4 41.9 0 66.7 1.41 64.2 41.9
C. Neal C. Neal G 5 26.6 10.6 2.4 3.0 0.8 0.0 3.8 8.8 4.2 - - - 29.5 29.4 85.7 0.29 56.3 35.2
S. Logwood S. Logwood G 5 28.2 7.0 4.2 1.4 1.0 0.4 1.0 5.2 7.8 - - - 46.2 57.1 100.0 -0.12 64.1 53.8
O. Aget O. Aget C 5 22.0 5.6 4.6 0.6 0.2 1.6 1.6 2.6 8.4 - - - 61.5 0 50.0 0.1 100.9 61.5
J. Hunter J. Hunter G 4 11.8 4.5 1.0 1.8 0.5 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.8 - - - 50.0 25.0 66.7 - 84.6 56.2
N. Scekic N. Scekic C 4 9.5 2.5 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 1.8 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 166.7 100.0
X. Adams X. Adams G 5 12.0 2.2 2.8 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.2 2.0 4.6 - - - 20.0 0.0 66.7 0.09 43.5 20.0
J. Furstinger J. Furstinger F 5 11.0 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.6 1.2 3.8 - - - 33.3 0 50.0 0.08 70.9 33.3
D. Williams D. Williams F 1 14.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 40 2.7 2.7 0.0 0 100.0 1.52 53.2 0.0
T. Jacobs T. Jacobs G 5 8.4 1.0 1.8 1.4 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.6 3.2 - - - 33.3 100.0 100.0 0.13 64.4 50.0
D. Kuiper D. Kuiper F 4 3.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 100.0 0.0
A. Mathis A. Mathis G 4 5.2 0.0 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.2 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 -0.41 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG