New Mexico Lobos
2022 Team Stats (3 games)
73.3
PPG
64.0
Opp
+9.3
Margin
40.8%
FG%
30.1%
3P%
65.3%
FT%
42.0
RPG
18.0
APG
10.7
TO
83.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1069 (#148) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1134 (#118) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.9 (#113) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.754 (#91) | - |
2022 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | vs | Grambling Lady Tigers | W | 86 - 50 |
| 2021-12-28 | vs | San José State Spartans | - | Preview |
| 2022-03-07 | vs | San Diego State Aztecs | W | 63 - 60 |
| 2022-03-08 | vs | Colorado State Rams | L | 71 - 82 |
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lato. Duff
|
G | 3 | 32.0 | 15.7 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 14.7 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 35.7 | 100.0 | 1.01 | 50.9 | 47.7 |
J. De La Cerda
|
G | 3 | 33.3 | 14.7 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 41.0 | 30.0 | 66.7 | 0.94 | 51.2 | 48.7 |
S. McGruder
|
F | 3 | 23.7 | 14.0 | 9.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 9.3 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 50.0 | 72.7 | -0.24 | 63.9 | 60.7 |
Lata. Duff
|
G | 3 | 32.0 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 9.0 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 25.9 | 25.0 | 66.7 | 1.01 | 37.1 | 35.2 |
A. Anderson
|
F | 3 | 27.3 | 6.0 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 21 | 1.1 | 11.4 | 38.9 | 12.5 | 100.0 | 0.6 | 46.6 | 41.7 |
P. Reus Piza
|
F | 3 | 20.7 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 42.2 | 40.0 |
V. Cumber
|
G | 1 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 40 | 4.4 | 21.6 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.55 | 75.0 | 75.0 |
N. Parkinson
|
C | 1 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | -37 | -12.3 | -71.6 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.24 | 53.2 | 50.0 |
A. Augmon
|
G | 3 | 9.3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 80.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 0.68 | 62.5 | 80.0 |
K. van Bennekom
|
G | 2 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0 | 1.02 | 83.3 | 83.3 |
M. Curtis
|
G | 2 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | -173 | -10.2 | -82.2 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.28 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
R. Renczes
|
G | 1 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | 2 | 2.0 | 200.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -1.61 | 17.4 | 0.0 |
Z. Seren
|
G | 2 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.04 | 36.2 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG