New Haven Chargers
2026-2027 Team Stats (2 games)
71.5
PPG
63.5
Opp
+8.0
Margin
39.0%
FG%
20.0%
3P%
63.6%
FT%
48.0
RPG
16.5
APG
21.5
TO
78.8
Est. poss./game
54.2
Adj PPG
57.1
Adj Opp PPG
#343
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2026-2027
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 620 (#356) | Preseason prior 620 (returning production + recruiting): last season 788, returning -110, transfers -58, freshmen +0 |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 706 (#360) | HCA +169 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 711 (#360) | HCA +169 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -16.2 (#321) | HCA +1.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -16.1 (#321) | HCA +1.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.017 (#351) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.163 (#325) | AdjNet -9.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.150 (#329) | AdjNet -12.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.184 (#343) | AdjO 54.2 | AdjD 57.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.187 (#341) | AdjO 54.2 | AdjD 57.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.134 (#350) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.134 (#350) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 701 (#358) | RD 221 | GP 1 |
| Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.077 (#356) | Chronological component blend with rest and venue. |
Rank through the season
League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.
Recency Ensemble
Log Adjusted
Elo
Points Off/Def Recency
2026-2027 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | vs | Mitchell Mariners | W | 103 - 44 |
| 2026-11-10 | @ | Tennessee Lady Volunteers | L | 40 - 83 |
| 2026-11-15 | vs | Siena Saints | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-18 | @ | Iona Gaels | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-20 | @ | Rhode Island Rams | - | Preview |
2026-2027 Roster
Estimated Minutes by Position
Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teaira Kelley
|
G | 1 | 38.0 | 17.0 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 20.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 62.5 | -0.58 | 54.8 | 50.0 |
Tanavia Turpin
|
G | 1 | 26.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 57.1 | 57.1 |
Jasmine McKay
|
G | 1 | 29.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 13.0 | -9.0 | -9 | 2 | -4.5 | -8.8 | 15.4 | 11.1 | 0 | -2.32 | 19.2 | 19.2 |
Schuyler Coles
|
G | 1 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | -11 | 2 | -5.5 | -23.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -3.8 | 30.7 | 25.0 |
Claudia Lazaro-Carrasco
|
C | 1 | 26.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
Carla Ramirez
|
F | 1 | 28.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
Laura Vera
|
G | 1 | 16.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | -6.0 | - | - | - | - | 12.5 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 12.5 | 12.5 |
Zanri Barnett
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Tanaiya Clarke
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Kaydence Daniels
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Ailani Davila
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Kate Hennessy
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Samantha Battle
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Mallory Farr
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Renelle Grannum
|
G | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -20 | 2 | -10.0 | -49.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4.05 | 0 | 0 |
Eveani Okwuosa
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 18 | 2 | 9.0 | 52.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.67 | 0 | 0 |
Jeeanna Pierantoni
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Simone Pugh-Greaves
|
C | 1 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2026-2027 Shot Zones
58 located field-goal attempts in 1 game (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Teaira KelleyTanavia TurpinJasmine McKayCarla RamirezClaudia Lazaro-CarrascoLaura Vera
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 6-12 | 50.0 | 12 | Tanavia Turpin 50% (6 pts) | Teaira Kelley 33% (4 pts) | Tanavia Turpin 33% (2 misses) | Teaira Kelley 33% (2 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 5-20 | 25.0 | 10 | Teaira Kelley 60% (6 pts) | Schuyler Coles 20% (2 pts) | Claudia Lazaro-Carrasco 20% (3 misses) | Jasmine McKay 20% (3 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 3-5 | 60.0 | 6 | Carla Ramirez 33% (2 pts) | Jasmine McKay 33% (2 pts) | Carla Ramirez 50% (1 misses) | Teaira Kelley 50% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 0-0 | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Mid-range right | 1-3 | 33.3 | 2 | Claudia Lazaro-Carrasco 100% (2 pts) | - | Carla Ramirez 50% (1 misses) | Simone Pugh-Greaves 50% (1 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 0-1 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Claudia Lazaro-Carrasco 100% (1 misses) | - |
| Right corner 3 | 0-1 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Jasmine McKay 100% (1 misses) | - |
| Above-break 3 left | 0-8 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Jasmine McKay 62% (5 misses) | Laura Vera 25% (2 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 0-1 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Jasmine McKay 100% (1 misses) | - |
| Above-break 3 right | 1-7 | 14.3 | 3 | Jasmine McKay 100% (3 pts) | - | Laura Vera 33% (2 misses) | Schuyler Coles 33% (2 misses) |