Nebraska
2020 Team Stats (8 games)
65.3
PPG
79.4
Opp
-13.0
Margin
38.5%
FG%
29.3%
3P%
67.0%
FT%
35.8
RPG
12.8
APG
12.4
TO
82.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1732 (#4) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1393 (#65) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.0 (#64) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.094 (#98) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.081 (#71) | NetEff -21.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.244 (#93) | AdjNet -9.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.243 (#93) | AdjNet -9.8 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | vs | Iowa Hawkeyes | W | 76 - 70 |
| 2020-01-14 | @ | Ohio State Buckeyes | L | 68 - 80 |
| 2020-01-25 | @ | Rutgers Scarlet Knights | L | 72 - 75 |
| 2020-02-01 | vs | Penn State Nittany Lions | L | 64 - 76 |
| 2020-02-08 | @ | Iowa Hawkeyes | L | 72 - 96 |
| 2020-02-11 | @ | Maryland Terrapins | L | 70 - 72 |
| 2020-02-27 | vs | Ohio State Buckeyes | L | 54 - 75 |
| 2020-03-05 | @ | Michigan Wolverines | L | 58 - 82 |
| 2020-03-11 | @ | Indiana Hoosiers | L | 64 - 89 |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H. Cheatham
|
G | 9 | 29.1 | 12.4 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 9.6 | 8.1 | - | - | - | 40.7 | 28.0 | 75.0 | - | 57.0 | 44.8 |
T. Thorbjarnarson
|
G | 9 | 33.0 | 11.4 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 7.6 | 10.9 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 41.0 | 85.7 | - | 72.5 | 58.8 |
D. Burke Jr.
|
G | 7 | 26.9 | 10.9 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 10.6 | 3.7 | 40 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 35.1 | 25.0 | 70.0 | 0.41 | 48.5 | 37.8 |
C. Mack
|
G | 7 | 32.7 | 10.4 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 8.3 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 36.2 | 27.3 | 66.7 | - | 56.5 | 41.4 |
J. Green
|
G | 8 | 23.2 | 9.4 | 5.4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 8.6 | 7.1 | -9 | -0.9 | -0.9 | 44.9 | 26.7 | 45.5 | -0.26 | 50.8 | 50.7 |
K. Cross
|
- | 9 | 19.1 | 7.0 | 4.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 7.1 | 5.9 | - | - | - | 28.1 | 22.6 | 81.8 | - | 45.8 | 33.6 |
M. Kavas
|
G | 5 | 12.6 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 45.5 | 66.7 | - | 63.6 | 61.8 |
Y. Ouedraogo
|
- | 9 | 21.3 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 35.3 | 0 | 60.0 | - | 46.8 | 35.3 |
A. Arop
|
- | 7 | 8.9 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 56.3 | 58.3 |
C. Easley
|
- | 8 | 15.9 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 22.7 | 15.4 | 71.4 | - | 33.9 | 27.3 |
N. Vedral
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
B. Banks
|
F | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG