Nebraska Cornhuskers
2023 Team Stats (15 games)
70.7
PPG
69.4
Opp
+3.2
Margin
40.4%
FG%
32.6%
3P%
67.8%
FT%
40.2
RPG
15.9
APG
16.5
TO
86.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1213 (#57) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1283 (#48) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +42.8 (#31) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.909 (#32) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-07 | vs | Omaha Mavericks | W | 100 - 36 |
| 2022-11-11 | vs | Houston Christian Huskies | W | 79 - 48 |
| 2022-11-15 | @ | Creighton Bluejays | L | 51 - 77 |
| 2022-11-19 | @ | Drake Bulldogs | L | 62 - 80 |
| 2022-11-26 | vs | Mississippi State Bulldogs | W | 73 - 65 |
| 2022-12-04 | @ | Maryland Terrapins | W | 90 - 67 |
| 2022-12-21 | vs | Kansas Jayhawks | W | 85 - 79 |
| 2022-12-28 | vs | Michigan Wolverines | L | 59 - 76 |
| 2023-01-01 | @ | Indiana Hoosiers | L | 62 - 74 |
| 2023-01-14 | vs | Ohio State Buckeyes | L | 67 - 76 |
| 2023-01-22 | vs | Maryland Terrapins | L | 54 - 69 |
| 2023-01-28 | @ | Iowa Hawkeyes | L | 76 - 80 |
| 2023-02-06 | @ | Northwestern Wildcats | W | 78 - 66 |
| 2023-02-12 | @ | Michigan Wolverines | L | 75 - 80 |
| 2023-02-18 | vs | Iowa Hawkeyes | L | 60 - 80 |
| 2023-02-22 | @ | Illinois Fighting Illini | W | 90 - 57 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Shelley
|
G | 15 | 37.8 | 16.1 | 4.5 | 6.4 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 13.1 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 40.3 | 37.6 | 87.8 | - | 55.6 | 50.8 |
I. Bourne
|
F | 15 | 30.0 | 12.3 | 6.3 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 10.3 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 50.3 | 30.8 | 61.9 | - | 56.3 | 55.5 |
A. Markowski
|
C | 15 | 28.3 | 11.9 | 9.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 9.7 | 11.7 | - | - | - | 42.5 | 33.3 | 59.2 | - | 50.2 | 46.6 |
S. Haiby
|
G | 10 | 27.8 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 9.5 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 28.6 | 76.9 | - | 49.0 | 42.1 |
A. Weidner
|
G | 6 | 27.3 | 8.8 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 33.3 | 69.0 | - | 55.5 | 47.1 |
A. Stewart
|
F | 15 | 12.0 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 40.8 | 21.2 | 69.2 | - | 48.2 | 45.8 |
C. Hake
|
G | 13 | 12.7 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 32.8 | 39.5 | 80.0 | - | 48.3 | 46.7 |
M. Krull
|
G | 15 | 27.1 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 35.8 | 30.6 | 58.3 | - | 45.7 | 44.0 |
K. Moriarty
|
G | 15 | 15.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 30.6 | 25.0 | 40.0 | - | 37.1 | 36.7 |
M. Mendelson
|
F | 10 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 35.0 | 0.0 | 40.0 | - | 37.6 | 35.0 |
K. Coley
|
F | 14 | 8.6 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 36.7 | 29.4 | 0 | - | 45.0 | 45.0 |
T. Brady
|
G | 4 | 14.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 40.0 | 50.0 | - | 27.2 | 25.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG