Nebraska
2012 Team Stats (7 games)
47.1
PPG
64.9
Opp
-4.1
Margin
33.4%
FG%
23.2%
3P%
77.1%
FT%
27.7
RPG
9.4
APG
14.4
TO
69.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1889 (#5) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1480 (#62) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +29.9 (#83) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.182 (#101) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.015 (#241) | NetEff -33.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.287 (#89) | AdjNet -8.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.281 (#88) | AdjNet -8.2 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B. Spencer
|
G | 28 | 32.4 | 15.4 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 15.8 | - | - | - | 33.9 | 22.4 | 88.6 | - | 161.2 | 39.4 |
T. McCray
|
G | 28 | 27.0 | 9.7 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 11.1 | - | - | - | 37.4 | 31.1 | 55.0 | - | 126.2 | 44.4 |
J. Diaz
|
C | 15 | 27.9 | 8.9 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 13.1 | - | - | - | 44.0 | 0 | 80.0 | - | 227.9 | 44.0 |
D. Talley
|
G | 23 | 23.5 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 11.6 | - | - | - | 39.5 | 36.8 | 87.5 | - | 196.8 | 47.7 |
B. Richardson
|
G | 28 | 30.8 | 7.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 11.4 | - | - | - | 44.6 | 40.9 | 75.7 | - | 137.0 | 52.7 |
B. Ubel
|
F | 28 | 28.3 | 6.9 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 11.4 | - | - | - | 53.1 | 14.3 | 71.4 | - | 174.0 | 54.1 |
C. Walker
|
G | 28 | 25.6 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 9.5 | 5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 36.7 | 16.7 | 50.0 | 0.86 | 168.6 | 40.8 |
J. Moore
|
F | 14 | 7.5 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 17 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 1.3 | 119.5 | 60.0 |
M. Fox
|
G | 20 | 10.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 33.3 | 50.0 | - | 108.7 | 37.5 |
D. Rivers
|
F | 18 | 8.6 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.7 | -6 | -0.4 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 105.9 | 0.0 |
C. Hilliard
|
G | 9 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 92.2 | 25.0 |
J. Tyrance
|
F | 2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
C. Niemann
|
C | 22 | 5.9 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 0.0 |
K. Kurkowski
|
F | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
T. Menke
|
G | 3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG