Nazareth
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1060 (#122) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1101 (#100) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +4.8 (#120) | HCA +2.4 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-11 | vs | Adrian | W | 67 - 56 |
| 2023-11-16 | vs | Rochester (NY) | L | 47 - 53 |
| 2023-11-18 | vs | RIT | W | 74 - 67 |
| 2023-11-25 | @ | SUNY Morrisville | W | 90 - 47 |
| 2023-12-01 | @ | Russell Sage | W | 54 - 40 |
| 2023-12-02 | @ | Hartwick | W | 69 - 44 |
| 2023-12-06 | vs | SUNY Geneseo | W | 80 - 69 |
| 2023-12-09 | vs | SUNY Brockport | W | 73 - 54 |
| 2023-12-16 | @ | Lycoming | W | 67 - 52 |
| 2023-12-29 | vs | Baruch | W | 82 - 51 |
| 2023-12-30 | vs | Brooklyn | W | 65 - 46 |
| 2024-01-05 | @ | Elmira | W | 80 - 55 |
| 2024-01-06 | @ | Alfred | W | 74 - 61 |
| 2024-01-09 | vs | Utica | W | 81 - 45 |
| 2024-01-16 | @ | Keuka | W | 81 - 37 |
| 2024-01-20 | vs | St. John Fisher | L | 62 - 69 |
| 2024-01-23 | vs | Houghton | W | 70 - 58 |
| 2024-01-26 | vs | Hartwick | W | 71 - 42 |
| 2024-01-27 | vs | Russell Sage | W | 83 - 54 |
| 2024-01-30 | @ | Utica | W | 70 - 50 |
| 2024-02-02 | vs | Alfred | W | 76 - 49 |
| 2024-02-03 | vs | Elmira | W | 82 - 47 |
| 2024-02-06 | vs | Keuka | W | 77 - 41 |
| 2024-02-10 | @ | Houghton | L | 54 - 62 |
| 2024-02-17 | @ | St. John Fisher | W | 73 - 65 |
| 2024-02-22 | vs | Houghton | L | 52 - 63 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molly Benetti | - | 12 | 25.1 | 14.7 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 10.8 | 14.1 | 23 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 59.7 | 50.0 | 54.1 | 0.24 | 60.6 | 60.5 |
| Olivia Dobrovosky | - | 12 | 27.5 | 13.4 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 9.8 | 13.8 | - | - | - | 52.1 | 20.0 | 71.7 | -0.12 | 57.4 | 52.6 |
| Kiara Anglin | - | 12 | 29.8 | 10.2 | 7.3 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 7.6 | 13.9 | 52 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 48.4 | 26.3 | 59.2 | 0.28 | 54.2 | 51.1 |
| Sarina McDowell | - | 12 | 15.7 | 9.1 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 47 | 4.7 | 7.0 | 65.7 | 0 | 72.4 | 0.31 | 68.3 | 65.7 |
| Katie MacLachlan | - | 12 | 25.6 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 8.6 | 7.4 | 48 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 39.8 | 19.4 | 70.0 | 0.4 | 44.2 | 42.7 |
| Madalyn Kelly | - | 12 | 13.6 | 5.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 14 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 32.8 | 29.8 | 66.7 | -0.04 | 46.2 | 44.3 |
| Leah Fusilli | - | 12 | 15.8 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 6.4 | 35 | 4.4 | 8.2 | 54.5 | 25.0 | 44.4 | 0.01 | 54.9 | 55.7 |
| Madilann Johnson | - | 12 | 23.0 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 27.5 | 23.1 | 60.0 | -0.18 | 35.1 | 34.1 |
| Alyssa Dobson | - | 12 | 9.3 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 35.7 | 100.0 | 0.22 | 56.3 | 53.1 |
| Morgan Caraballo | - | 12 | 9.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 6 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 41.2 | 0.0 | 75.0 | -0.05 | 45.3 | 41.2 |
| CLAIRE BRODERICK | - | 3 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.7 | -0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| BRAYDEN SCHULTZ | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG