Navy Midshipmen
2011 Team Stats (3 games)
55.3
PPG
73.3
Opp
-4.1
Margin
33.7%
FG%
26.9%
3P%
62.7%
FT%
28.3
RPG
9.0
APG
18.3
TO
83.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1150 (#255) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1182 (#250) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +16.1 (#304) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.365 (#81) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.012 (#309) | NetEff -33.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.143 (#101) | AdjNet -15.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.141 (#102) | AdjNet -15.6 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Sugars
|
G | 15 | 34.7 | 16.3 | 5.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 18.9 | -8 | -8.0 | -36.6 | 34.0 | 34.4 | 57.1 | 0.69 | 217.5 | 44.3 |
J.J. Avila
|
F | 15 | 29.7 | 10.7 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 16.5 | 17 | 17.0 | 182.1 | 44.0 | 46.7 | 66.7 | 0.1 | 305.9 | 58.0 |
O.J. Avworo
|
G | 15 | 30.0 | 9.5 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 13.6 | 1 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 31.6 | 16.7 | 60.0 | 0.59 | 257.2 | 34.2 |
G. Brown
|
G | 15 | 23.7 | 9.1 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 11.5 | -1 | -0.5 | -3.7 | 33.3 | 35.3 | 100.0 | 0.28 | 217.1 | 43.3 |
M. Veazey
|
C | 15 | 14.3 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 8.5 | 10 | 10.0 | 40.5 | 47.1 | 0 | 83.3 | 0.92 | 140.6 | 47.1 |
I. Roberts
|
G | 15 | 21.0 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 7.3 | 24 | 24.0 | 279.6 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 0.02 | 232.8 | 40.0 |
R. Garcia
|
G | 14 | 24.1 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 6.6 | 2 | 2.0 | 10.5 | 38.5 | 16.7 | 100.0 | 0.67 | 198.1 | 42.3 |
J. Loupos
|
F | 14 | 12.9 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 39 | 39.0 | 325.0 | 21.4 | 20.0 | 75.0 | 0.56 | 108.4 | 25.0 |
B. Wyatt
|
G | 15 | 10.9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 9 | 9.0 | 135.8 | 27.3 | 20.0 | 66.7 | -0.24 | 100.3 | 31.8 |
T. Wynn
|
G | 11 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 39 | 39.0 | 806.9 | 44.4 | 33.3 | 66.7 | -0.47 | 72.7 | 50.0 |
C. Smith
|
F | 6 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 22 | 22.0 | 1600.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.17 | 0 | 0 |
T. Connolly
|
G | 5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 39 | 39.0 | 806.9 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.47 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
J. Liebert
|
F | 6 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 39 | 39.0 | 806.9 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.47 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG