NJIT
2023 Team Stats (17 games)
70.5
PPG
75.4
Opp
-8.9
Margin
44.8%
FG%
37.8%
3P%
68.4%
FT%
34.4
RPG
10.5
APG
10.3
TO
76.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 883 (#652) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 896 (#643) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +10.1 (#389) | HCA +2.8 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.259 (#304) | NetEff -9.9 |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-11 | @ | California Baptist Lancers | L | 43 - 59 |
| 2022-11-22 | @ | Sacred Heart Pioneers | W | 85 - 75 |
| 2022-11-27 | vs | Wagner Seahawks | L | 57 - 62 |
| 2022-11-30 | @ | Cincinnati Bearcats | L | 60 - 86 |
| 2022-12-03 | vs | Bucknell Bison | L | 63 - 79 |
| 2023-01-08 | @ | Maine Black Bears | W | 91 - 83 |
| 2023-01-11 | vs | Binghamton Bearcats | L | 71 - 72 |
| 2023-01-14 | vs | UAlbany Great Danes | W | 74 - 67 |
| 2023-01-19 | @ | Bryant Bulldogs | L | 75 - 87 |
| 2023-01-22 | @ | Vermont Catamounts | L | 69 - 85 |
| 2023-01-25 | vs | UMBC Retrievers | W | 69 - 65 |
| 2023-02-01 | vs | New Hampshire Wildcats | L | 67 - 74 |
| 2023-02-04 | @ | UMass Lowell River Hawks | L | 61 - 90 |
| 2023-02-08 | @ | UMBC Retrievers | L | 63 - 72 |
| 2023-02-25 | @ | UAlbany Great Danes | L | 68 - 82 |
| 2023-02-28 | @ | New Hampshire Wildcats | L | 58 - 59 |
| 2023-03-04 | @ | Vermont Catamounts | L | 57 - 84 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Coleman
|
- | 8 | 29.0 | 14.8 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 9.2 | 9.4 | - | - | - | 48.6 | 50.0 | 71.4 | - | 70.9 | 59.5 |
K. Osawe
|
- | 17 | 29.9 | 10.9 | 9.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 8.4 | 11.7 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 9.1 | 78.8 | - | 59.0 | 45.8 |
Adam Hess
|
- | 17 | 28.2 | 9.7 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 40.9 | 37.9 | 74.1 | - | 67.7 | 52.3 |
R. Sullivan
|
- | 17 | 27.7 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 20 | 2.9 | 16.9 | 35.3 | 33.3 | 54.5 | 0.32 | 54.1 | 42.2 |
M. Gray
|
- | 17 | 27.6 | 7.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 5.7 | 6.0 | -8 | -1.1 | -2.0 | 48.5 | 44.0 | 64.7 | 0.51 | 61.7 | 54.1 |
Kjell de Graaf
|
- | 17 | 18.2 | 7.2 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 6.5 | - | - | - | 44.0 | 39.5 | 56.0 | - | 70.9 | 55.3 |
S. Diakite
|
- | 16 | 22.4 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 8.1 | - | - | - | 52.9 | 0 | 44.0 | - | 62.3 | 52.9 |
P. McMillan IV
|
- | 13 | 14.7 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 46.6 | 40.0 | 57.1 | - | 55.7 | 51.7 |
D. Faison
|
- | 14 | 14.0 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 4.4 | - | - | - | 68.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 81.9 | 70.0 |
Justin Anderson
|
- | 16 | 10.7 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 1.1 | -11 | -1.1 | -1.6 | 27.3 | 23.8 | 87.5 | 0.77 | 40.0 | 33.0 |
K. Mason
|
- | 6 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.2 | -25 | -1.8 | -3.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.52 | 122.2 | 50.0 |
Eyal Nankin
|
- | 5 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG