NANTERRE 92
Also known as: NANTERRE 92
Program History
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 952 (#18) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 980 (#14) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -1.1 (#15) | HCA +3.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.426 (#17) | - |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-30 | vs | CEDEVITA OLIMPIJA LJUBLJANA | W | 80 - 76 |
| 2020-10-07 | @ | HERBALIFE GRAN CANARIA | L | 82 - 94 |
| 2020-10-13 | vs | DOLOMITI ENERGIA TRENTO | L | 65 - 71 |
| 2020-10-21 | @ | PROMITHEAS PATRAS | L | 72 - 88 |
| 2020-11-04 | @ | CEDEVITA OLIMPIJA LJUBLJANA | L | 63 - 75 |
| 2020-11-11 | vs | HERBALIFE GRAN CANARIA | W | 90 - 74 |
| 2020-11-18 | @ | DOLOMITI ENERGIA TRENTO | W | 104 - 102 |
| 2020-12-08 | vs | PROMITHEAS PATRAS | W | 91 - 70 |
| 2020-12-22 | vs | FRUTTI EXTRA BURSASPOR | L | 90 - 91 |
| 2020-12-23 | @ | FRUTTI EXTRA BURSASPOR | L | 92 - 102 |
| 2021-01-13 | vs | AS MONACO | L | 65 - 93 |
| 2021-01-20 | @ | JOVENTUT BADALONA | L | 90 - 95 |
| 2021-01-27 | @ | UNICAJA MALAGA | W | 92 - 83 |
| 2021-02-03 | vs | UNICAJA MALAGA | W | 80 - 74 |
| 2021-03-02 | @ | AS MONACO | L | 94 - 98 |
| 2021-03-09 | vs | JOVENTUT BADALONA | L | 88 - 95 |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WARREN, CHRIS | - | 16 | 31.7 | 15.8 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 11.0 | 9.6 | -47 | -2.9 | -3.7 | 49.4 | 52.6 | 84.4 | - | - | - |
| STONE, TYLER | - | 16 | 29.5 | 12.8 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 10.9 | 8.7 | -69 | -4.3 | -5.9 | 45.4 | 34.6 | 58.1 | - | - | - |
| CORDINIER, ISAIA | - | 13 | 34.0 | 15.8 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 10.5 | 13.5 | 17 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 52.6 | 44.9 | 81.6 | - | - | - |
| KABA, ALPHA | - | 15 | 23.6 | 11.1 | 8.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 7.5 | 12.9 | 15 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 56.2 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | - | - |
| BOUQUET, DAMIEN | - | 15 | 20.8 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 4.5 | 4.4 | -22 | -1.5 | -2.8 | 35.8 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | - | - |
| FEVRIER, IVAN | - | 16 | 17.3 | 6.1 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 5.7 | 2.8 | -16 | -1.0 | -2.3 | 37.4 | 40.0 | 88.9 | - | - | - |
| BERHANEMESKEL, JOHNNY | - | 15 | 17.3 | 8.4 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 52.4 | 52.9 | 84.6 | - | - | - |
| CONKLIN, BRIAN | - | 16 | 16.2 | 7.8 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 5.9 | 5.4 | -59 | -3.7 | -9.1 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 73.8 | - | - | - |
| REED, MARCQUISE | - | 5 | 23.0 | 10.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 4.8 | -25 | -5.0 | -8.7 | 37.8 | 33.3 | 86.7 | - | - | - |
| BUYCKS, DWIGHT | - | 5 | 22.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 5.8 | 2.2 | -8 | -1.6 | -2.9 | 27.6 | 14.3 | 33.3 | - | - | - |
| REBIC, NIKOLA | - | 5 | 13.9 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 1.4 | -22 | -4.4 | -12.7 | 43.8 | 27.3 | 60.0 | - | - | - |
| FORTAS, FLORIAN | - | 14 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 6 | 0.4 | 4.1 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 100.0 | - | - | - |
| WEMBANYAMA, VICTOR | - | 5 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 8 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - |
| EYANGO-DINGO, SAMUEL | - | 5 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 6 | 1.2 | 29.1 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG