Mt. St. Joseph
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1027 (#202) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1019 (#235) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.0 (#179) | HCA +2.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.415 (#517) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.491 (#297) | NetEff -0.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.246 (#490) | AdjNet -9.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.239 (#490) | AdjNet -9.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.350 (#486) | AdjO 64.7 | AdjD 71.5 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Wilmington (OH) | W | 98 - 62 |
| 2024-11-11 | vs | Centre | W | 77 - 66 |
| 2024-11-14 | @ | Wabash | L | 59 - 87 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Elmhurst | L | 56 - 69 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Albion | L | 63 - 84 |
| 2024-11-24 | vs | Alma | W | 79 - 62 |
| 2024-11-27 | vs | Wittenberg | W | 72 - 63 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Bluffton | W | 79 - 78 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Transylvania | L | 62 - 67 |
| 2024-12-14 | @ | Earlham | W | 88 - 72 |
| 2024-12-18 | vs | Franklin | L | 58 - 69 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Manchester | W | 75 - 71 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Rose-Hulman | L | 57 - 65 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Anderson (IN) | L | 66 - 69 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Berea | W | 84 - 77 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Hanover | L | 60 - 72 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Bluffton | W | 78 - 65 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Anderson (IN) | L | 67 - 83 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Hanover | L | 53 - 64 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Manchester | W | 71 - 70 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Franklin | L | 61 - 73 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Earlham | W | 68 - 63 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Rose-Hulman | L | 66 - 78 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Transylvania | L | 71 - 73 |
| 2025-02-18 | @ | Berea | W | 83 - 76 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Rose-Hulman | L | 52 - 69 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luke Collinsworth | - | 26 | 30.0 | 15.5 | 7.1 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 12.2 | 11.4 | -36 | -2.8 | -4.4 | 49.7 | 38.9 | 68.4 | 0.3 | 57.7 | 55.5 |
| Mathew Menninger | - | 26 | 31.6 | 11.5 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 8.0 | 9.5 | -52 | -2.7 | -6.9 | 52.9 | 30.7 | 78.6 | 0.47 | 62.4 | 58.4 |
| Michael Loftis | - | 25 | 22.6 | 10.5 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 8.4 | 5.1 | 14 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 45.9 | 41.9 | 70.9 | 0.88 | 56.2 | 53.3 |
| Elisha Jones | - | 23 | 26.0 | 9.1 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 8.9 | 3.7 | -65 | -3.8 | -10.5 | 36.1 | 28.3 | 68.1 | -0.52 | 46.5 | 43.4 |
| Joe Brand | - | 26 | 26.9 | 7.9 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 8.1 | 10 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 45.6 | 32.9 | 83.0 | 0.49 | 60.5 | 55.1 |
| Jason Lavender | - | 25 | 21.4 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 5.8 | 4.6 | -17 | -1.7 | -2.4 | 41.7 | 29.7 | 64.1 | 1.08 | 50.9 | 48.3 |
| Josh Batte | - | 19 | 18.3 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 3.2 | -27 | -3.4 | -5.4 | 35.0 | 26.0 | 72.4 | -0.09 | 48.5 | 43.1 |
| Dale Bush | - | 26 | 11.2 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | -6 | -1.0 | -4.0 | 36.4 | 34.7 | 54.5 | 0.19 | 50.1 | 49.2 |
| Braden Miller | - | 26 | 8.5 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 2.0 | -28 | -3.5 | -37.8 | 24.2 | 22.5 | 46.7 | -0.1 | 33.1 | 31.1 |
| Alex Willet | - | 14 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.7 | -18 | -6.0 | -48.8 | 66.7 | 62.5 | 0 | -0.44 | 94.4 | 94.4 |
| Corey Rogers | - | 25 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | -15 | -3.0 | -24.9 | 33.3 | 30.0 | 0.0 | -0.24 | 38.8 | 40.5 |
| Dontre Russel | - | 15 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 50.6 | 45.0 |
| Philip Kahn | - | 25 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 50.0 | - | 77.3 | 83.3 |
| Luke Rogers | - | 18 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Elijah Bishop | - | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG