Mount Aloysius
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1027 (#181) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1039 (#190) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -12.4 (#301) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.543 (#432) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.646 (#187) | NetEff +4.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.065 (#577) | AdjNet -23.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.054 (#586) | AdjNet -24.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.201 (#580) | AdjO 58.8 | AdjD 73.9 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-13 | @ | Wilson | W | 95 - 72 |
| 2024-11-15 | @ | York (PA) | L | 53 - 67 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Notre Dame (MD) | W | 69 - 47 |
| 2024-11-20 | vs | Hood | W | 65 - 53 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Valley Forge | W | 78 - 43 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Penn St.-Altoona | L | 61 - 68 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | La Roche | L | 51 - 73 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Pitt.-Bradford | W | 104 - 52 |
| 2024-12-29 | vs | Marywood | W | 77 - 55 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | Wis.-Stevens Point | L | 29 - 89 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | McDaniel | L | 47 - 67 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Penn St.-Behrend | L | 66 - 107 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Alfred St. | W | 72 - 54 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Carlow | W | 69 - 60 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Johns Hopkins | L | 33 - 77 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Hilbert | W | 67 - 31 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Pitt.-Greensburg | W | 78 - 59 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Pitt.-Bradford | W | 105 - 77 |
| 2025-01-29 | @ | La Roche | L | 52 - 80 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Penn St.-Behrend | L | 55 - 74 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Penn St.-Altoona | W | 69 - 62 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Alfred St. | W | 72 - 57 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Carlow | W | 87 - 78 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Pitt.-Greensburg | W | 83 - 40 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Hilbert | W | 70 - 41 |
| 2025-02-25 | vs | Pitt.-Bradford | W | 74 - 33 |
| 2025-02-28 | @ | La Roche | L | 59 - 76 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molly Kosmack | - | 27 | 29.3 | 15.9 | 11.4 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 10.7 | 18.1 | -12 | -0.4 | -0.4 | 59.0 | 0.0 | 77.0 | -0.26 | 63.1 | 59.0 |
| Angelina Kohlwaies | - | 27 | 27.4 | 10.7 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 10.3 | 8.4 | 9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 34.7 | 34.5 | 70.1 | -0.01 | 47.0 | 43.5 |
| Annalyn Isaacs | - | 27 | 23.0 | 8.9 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 7.7 | 6.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 38.0 | 39.7 | 73.0 | -0.38 | 53.3 | 51.0 |
| Molly Richards | - | 23 | 25.1 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 3.8 | 8.0 | 3.2 | -28 | -1.0 | -1.2 | 33.2 | 32.3 | 69.4 | -0.27 | 46.4 | 41.6 |
| Mackenzie Barr | - | 23 | 15.0 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 5.6 | 6.5 | -32 | -1.1 | -1.8 | 41.4 | 0.0 | 62.5 | -0.21 | 46.2 | 41.4 |
| Jade Love-morris | - | 3 | 20.3 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 35 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 40.0 | 16.7 | 71.4 | 0.24 | 49.8 | 43.3 |
| Mariah Hall | - | 25 | 11.7 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 2.8 | -9 | -0.3 | -1.1 | 42.3 | 32.7 | 84.6 | -0.45 | 53.5 | 51.0 |
| Ashlie Weaver | - | 25 | 15.6 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 16 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 41.9 | 25.0 | 67.6 | 0.08 | 49.5 | 44.8 |
| Masie Reed | - | 27 | 15.4 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 30.0 | 25.5 | 50.0 | 0.21 | 37.5 | 36.5 |
| Amber Cross | - | 27 | 13.3 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 24.6 | 14.3 | 67.6 | 0.4 | 37.5 | 26.3 |
| Brionna Brown | - | 25 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 30.4 | 37.5 | 75.0 | 0.21 | 41.9 | 40.2 |
| Anna Burkey | - | 16 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 16.7 | 50.0 | - | 37.1 | 36.1 |
| Lauryn Kitchen | - | 26 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.1 | -0.1 | 21 | 1.3 | 8.6 | 17.9 | 11.1 | 0 | 0.19 | 21.4 | 21.4 |
| Paris Dugan | - | 13 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 10.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.19 | 19.8 | 10.0 |
| Jenna Luciani | - | 17 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG