Mississippi University For Women Owls
Also known as: Mississippi University For Women Owls
Program History
2025 Team Stats (2 games)
46.5
PPG
66.0
Opp
-17.0
Margin
31.8%
FG%
23.1%
3P%
77.8%
FT%
30.0
RPG
8.5
APG
16.0
TO
75.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 997 (#312) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -16.8 (#568) | HCA +2.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.470 (#409) | AdjO 72.6 | AdjD 73.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.160 (#616) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.216 (#603) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 910 (#442) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | @ | Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils | L | 49 - 66 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Walker
|
- | 1 | 24.0 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
C. Evans
|
- | 1 | 29.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 56.2 | 56.2 |
T. Smithey
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 68.0 | 60.0 |
J. Dukes
|
- | 1 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 44.4 | 42.9 |
Ja. Dukes
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 28.6 | 28.6 |
J. Reid
|
- | 1 | 30.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | -2.0 | -73 | -1.8 | -3.6 | 14.3 | 25.0 | 0 | 0.41 | 21.4 | 21.4 |
D. Doss
|
- | 1 | 26.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 34.7 | 0.0 |
I. Ball
|
- | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 34.7 | 0.0 |
R. Harrison
|
- | 1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 259 | 7.6 | 10.5 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1.63 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
C. Smith
|
- | 1 | 17.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | -1.0 | -187 | -6.2 | -9.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.32 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
E. Bass Jr.
|
- | 1 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 279 | 8.5 | 13.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2.42 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
M. Godsey
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
P. Matthews
|
- | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG