Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders
2021 Team Stats (3 games)
73.0
PPG
70.2
Opp
+0.0
Margin
44.8%
FG%
36.0%
3P%
66.7%
FT%
35.0
RPG
16.3
APG
10.0
TO
75.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1105 (#135) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1187 (#93) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +23.9 (#121) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.554 (#149) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-11 | vs | Louisiana Tech Lady Techsters | W | 77 - 71 |
| 2021-03-12 | vs | UTEP Miners | W | 74 - 58 |
| 2021-03-13 | @ | Rice Owls | W | 68 - 65 |
| 2021-03-21 | @ | Tennessee Lady Volunteers | L | 62 - 87 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Hayes
|
G | 4 | 40.0 | 25.0 | 4.2 | 6.0 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 19.2 | 13.5 | - | - | - | 51.9 | 40.0 | 66.7 | - | 57.1 | 54.5 |
C. Whitson
|
F | 4 | 36.8 | 13.0 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 8.8 | 10.8 | - | - | - | 45.7 | 46.7 | 100.0 | - | 69.1 | 65.7 |
Ai. Hayes
|
G | 4 | 37.5 | 12.8 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 11.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 38.6 | 42.9 | 83.3 | - | 54.7 | 52.3 |
Al. Whittington
|
G | 4 | 38.2 | 10.5 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 10.8 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 32.6 | 23.3 | 70.0 | - | 44.3 | 40.7 |
D. Cage
|
G | 4 | 35.5 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 7.8 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 22.6 | 20.0 | 0.0 | - | 28.6 | 29.0 |
R. Boothe
|
F | 4 | 9.2 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 55.1 | 54.5 |
K. Kozlova
|
C | 2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
T. Lewis
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Grannum
|
F | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG