Miami
2021 Team Stats (10 games)
70.5
PPG
74.6
Opp
-4.1
Margin
43.8%
FG%
33.7%
3P%
74.7%
FT%
33.2
RPG
11.9
APG
11.9
TO
77.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1282 (#96) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1377 (#65) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +34.4 (#46) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.343 (#61) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.303 (#48) | NetEff -7.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.362 (#74) | AdjNet -4.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.363 (#74) | AdjNet -4.9 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-29 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 78 - 80 |
| 2021-01-16 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | W | 78 - 72 |
| 2021-01-27 | @ | Florida State Seminoles | L | 59 - 81 |
| 2021-02-06 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 76 - 80 |
| 2021-02-24 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 71 - 88 |
| 2021-03-01 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | L | 51 - 62 |
| 2021-03-05 | vs | Boston College Eagles | W | 80 - 76 |
| 2021-03-09 | @ | Pittsburgh Panthers | W | 79 - 73 |
| 2021-03-10 | @ | Clemson Tigers | W | 67 - 64 |
| 2021-03-11 | @ | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | L | 66 - 70 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isaiah Wong
|
- | 10 | 36.4 | 18.6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 13.6 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 41.9 | 43.4 | 83.1 | - | 57.4 | 50.4 |
K. McGusty
|
G | 8 | 37.5 | 17.1 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 13.0 | 10.2 | - | - | - | 49.0 | 31.6 | 85.2 | - | 59.1 | 54.8 |
Matt Cross
|
- | 2 | 27.5 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 66.7 | 100.0 | - | 95.5 | 93.3 |
E. Olaniyi
|
G | 9 | 36.0 | 10.6 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 9.8 | 7.1 | - | - | - | 39.8 | 23.8 | 75.0 | - | 49.1 | 45.5 |
N. Brooks
|
C | 10 | 31.3 | 9.5 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 5.9 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 61.0 | 0.0 | 67.6 | -0.54 | 64.2 | 61.0 |
A. Walker
|
- | 10 | 30.3 | 8.9 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 17 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 36.4 | 26.9 | 75.0 | 0.34 | 45.2 | 40.3 |
Harlond Beverly
|
G | 4 | 27.8 | 7.0 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 8.2 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 18.2 | 50.0 | -0.0 | 40.3 | 39.4 |
D. Gak
|
F | 10 | 13.7 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 3.6 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | - | 49.4 | 50.0 |
W. Herenton
|
G | 8 | 11.0 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 38.5 | 0.0 | - | 36.6 | 40.5 |
E. Timberlake
|
G | 1 | 25.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.01 | 10.2 | 0.0 |
F. Gkogkos
|
- | 3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG