Maryville (TN)
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 934 (#357) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 922 (#342) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -8.0 (#271) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.456 (#471) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.762 (#138) | NetEff +8.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.230 (#476) | AdjNet -10.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.213 (#480) | AdjNet -11.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.335 (#478) | AdjO 56.7 | AdjD 64.2 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | @ | Centre | L | 47 - 65 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Berry | L | 59 - 88 |
| 2024-11-27 | @ | Eastern Ky. | L | 25 - 101 |
| 2024-12-02 | vs | Sewanee | L | 66 - 68 |
| 2024-12-11 | vs | Oglethorpe | L | 50 - 67 |
| 2024-12-16 | @ | Mary Washington | L | 46 - 63 |
| 2024-12-17 | @ | Catholic | L | 33 - 74 |
| 2024-12-29 | @ | Roanoke | L | 59 - 70 |
| 2024-12-30 | vs | Ferrum | L | 38 - 61 |
| 2025-01-07 | vs | Wesleyan (GA) | W | 75 - 34 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Warren Wilson | W | 91 - 51 |
| 2025-01-14 | vs | Asbury | L | 61 - 69 |
| 2025-01-17 | @ | LaGrange | L | 57 - 63 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Huntingdon | W | 56 - 48 |
| 2025-01-24 | vs | Piedmont | L | 57 - 73 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Belhaven | W | 72 - 67 |
| 2025-01-28 | vs | Covenant | W | 59 - 53 |
| 2025-01-31 | @ | Wesleyan (GA) | W | 74 - 27 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Agnes Scott | W | 80 - 53 |
| 2025-02-04 | @ | Piedmont | L | 52 - 67 |
| 2025-02-07 | vs | Huntingdon | W | 68 - 58 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | LaGrange | W | 84 - 74 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Asbury | L | 52 - 63 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Agnes Scott | W | 59 - 36 |
| 2025-02-18 | @ | Covenant | W | 59 - 48 |
| 2025-02-21 | @ | Belhaven | L | 61 - 70 |
| 2025-02-25 | vs | LaGrange | L | 69 - 71 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ella Haney | - | 27 | 27.9 | 12.3 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 11.3 | 5.7 | -23 | -0.6 | -0.7 | 39.5 | 26.5 | 64.9 | -0.31 | 47.6 | 44.0 |
| Ella Tharpe | - | 27 | 28.7 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 7.7 | 5.8 | -2 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 51.0 | 14.3 | 76.0 | 0.07 | 53.4 | 51.7 |
| Emma Huskey | - | 27 | 20.0 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 9.9 | 68 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 62.3 | 0 | 68.6 | 0.87 | 65.6 | 62.3 |
| Emily Allen | - | 27 | 23.1 | 6.2 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 7.9 | 1.1 | 9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 28.2 | 23.5 | 58.3 | -0.39 | 35.7 | 32.6 |
| Kadence Stoner | - | 27 | 23.2 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 5.8 | 6.9 | 7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 40.4 | 0.0 | 65.2 | 0.23 | 44.3 | 40.4 |
| Olivia Cathers | - | 27 | 15.1 | 5.8 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 79 | 3.2 | 6.2 | 33.7 | 26.7 | 95.5 | 0.72 | 41.8 | 38.2 |
| Halle Kitchen | - | 27 | 21.6 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 4.9 | 51 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 38.5 | 19.4 | 65.2 | -0.12 | 46.7 | 41.3 |
| Braxton Fritz | - | 27 | 14.2 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 7 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 38.1 | 25.0 | 66.7 | -0.34 | 44.8 | 42.3 |
| Reagan Brown | - | 27 | 11.7 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 11 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 31.0 | 17.0 | 70.0 | -0.01 | 36.2 | 34.5 |
| Niles Daniel | - | 27 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | -8 | -0.3 | -1.4 | 48.4 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.1 | 50.1 | 48.4 |
| Victoria Wright | - | 21 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | -2 | -0.2 | -1.3 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 90.0 | 0.01 | 49.0 | 33.3 |
| Kaylen Schultz | - | 25 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23.5 | 0.0 | 75.0 | -0.01 | 34.1 | 23.5 |
| Taylor Bledsoe | - | 22 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG