Maryland Terrapins
2010 Team Stats (10 games)
55.1
PPG
65.7
Opp
-4.3
Margin
37.4%
FG%
30.6%
3P%
58.9%
FT%
35.2
RPG
10.5
APG
0.0
TO
60.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2009-2010
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1558 (#8) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1552 (#6) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +46.9 (#8) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.942 (#10) | - |
2010 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-11-16 | vs | New Hampshire Wildcats | W | 63 - 43 |
| 2009-11-22 | @ | Mississippi State Bulldogs | L | 55 - 84 |
| 2009-12-10 | @ | Towson Tigers | L | 55 - 67 |
| 2009-12-27 | vs | Stony Brook Seawolves | W | 76 - 44 |
| 2010-01-11 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | W | 61 - 60 |
| 2010-01-17 | @ | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 64 - 75 |
| 2010-01-24 | vs | Duke Blue Devils | L | 57 - 58 |
| 2010-02-05 | vs | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | L | 60 - 61 |
| 2010-02-21 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 59 - 71 |
| 2010-02-28 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 61 - 94 |
| 2010-03-05 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 64 - 66 |
2010 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G. Vasquez
|
- | 1 | 38.0 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 20.0 | 18.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | - | 62.3 | 65.0 |
L. Milbourne
|
- | 1 | 34.0 | 19.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 16.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 54.8 | 50.0 |
L. Kizer
|
NA | 9 | 0.0 | 12.6 | 8.7 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 10.3 | 10.8 | - | - | - | 44.1 | 42.9 | 77.8 | - | 51.9 | 45.7 |
C. Tucker
|
- | 1 | 29.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 46.3 | 45.5 |
D. Tchatchouang
|
NA | 10 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 10.3 | 2.7 | - | - | - | 35.9 | 29.7 | 35.3 | - | 41.1 | 41.3 |
L. Bjork
|
G | 9 | 0.0 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 7.9 | 3.6 | - | - | - | 38.0 | 39.7 | 100.0 | - | 56.4 | 54.2 |
E. Hayes
|
- | 1 | 37.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 38.9 | 38.9 |
J. Williams
|
- | 1 | 21.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 50.9 | 50.0 |
T. Hawkins
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 23.5 | 18.2 |
K. Rodgers
|
G | 7 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 6.9 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 24.2 | 85.7 | - | 37.2 | 33.3 |
A. Barrett
|
G | 4 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 5.5 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 22.7 | 28.6 | 46.7 | - | 33.2 | 27.3 |
D. Taylor
|
NA | 8 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 34.3 | 12.5 | 46.2 | - | 38.1 | 35.7 |
Y. Oyefuwa
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 51.0 | 60.0 |
D. Gregory
|
- | 1 | 19.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
A. Bowie
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
J. Padgett
|
- | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG