Marshall Thundering Herd
2009 Team Stats (5 games)
67.6
PPG
64.2
Opp
+1.1
Margin
45.5%
FG%
37.5%
3P%
70.2%
FT%
34.8
RPG
16.0
APG
0.0
TO
62.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1165 (#90) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1051 (#180) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +16.4 (#211) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.403 (#240) | - |
2009 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-11-14 | @ | App State Mountaineers | W | 67 - 65 |
| 2008-11-17 | vs | North Texas Mean Green | W | 78 - 69 |
| 2008-11-21 | vs | Tennessee State Lady Tigers | W | 78 - 56 |
| 2008-11-22 | vs | UL Monroe Warhawks | L | 67 - 69 |
| 2008-11-25 | vs | Morehead State Eagles | W | 56 - 51 |
| 2008-12-02 | vs | UT Arlington Mavericks | W | 82 - 72 |
| 2008-12-06 | @ | Seton Hall Pirates | L | 52 - 73 |
| 2008-12-13 | vs | Ohio Bobcats | L | 53 - 67 |
| 2008-12-16 | vs | Houston Christian Huskies | W | 91 - 50 |
| 2008-12-20 | vs | Richmond Spiders | L | 49 - 74 |
| 2008-12-29 | vs | Mississippi State Bulldogs | L | 65 - 73 |
| 2008-12-30 | @ | UNC Asheville Bulldogs | W | 89 - 68 |
| 2009-01-03 | @ | East Carolina Pirates | L | 47 - 70 |
| 2009-01-08 | @ | SMU Mustangs | W | 70 - 63 |
| 2009-01-10 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 51 - 37 |
| 2009-01-14 | @ | West Virginia Mountaineers | L | 65 - 74 |
| 2009-01-18 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | W | 85 - 83 |
| 2009-01-22 | vs | UAB Blazers | W | 64 - 53 |
| 2009-01-24 | vs | Memphis Tigers | W | 72 - 57 |
| 2009-01-29 | @ | Southern Miss Lady Eagles | L | 64 - 70 |
| 2009-01-31 | @ | UCF Knights | L | 67 - 75 |
| 2009-02-05 | vs | Tulane Green Wave | L | 45 - 58 |
| 2009-02-08 | @ | UTEP Miners | L | 62 - 71 |
| 2009-02-13 | vs | UCF Knights | L | 50 - 68 |
| 2009-02-15 | vs | Southern Miss Lady Eagles | L | 61 - 69 |
| 2009-02-20 | @ | UAB Blazers | W | 67 - 50 |
| 2009-02-22 | @ | Memphis Tigers | W | 70 - 61 |
| 2009-02-26 | vs | Houston Cougars | L | 58 - 67 |
| 2009-02-28 | vs | Rice Owls | W | 61 - 51 |
| 2009-03-05 | vs | Memphis Tigers | W | 76 - 57 |
| 2009-03-06 | @ | UTEP Miners | W | 72 - 70 |
| 2009-03-07 | @ | Southern Miss Lady Eagles | L | 56 - 64 |
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Baker
|
G | 4 | 0.0 | 13.8 | 5.5 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 5.2 | 9.5 | 12.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 78.6 | - | 62.3 | 57.9 |
D. Pitts
|
- | 7 | 32.1 | 13.1 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 10.7 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 37.3 | 36.7 | 83.3 | - | 52.2 | 44.7 |
M. Holum
|
- | 5 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 7.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 7.8 | 15.2 | - | - | - | 56.4 | 0 | 55.3 | - | 58.3 | 56.4 |
M. Humphrey
|
- | 7 | 29.9 | 12.9 | 5.7 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 7.9 | 10.7 | - | - | - | 61.8 | 53.8 | 55.6 | - | 67.3 | 68.2 |
C. Handy
|
G | 5 | 0.0 | 11.8 | 6.8 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 9.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 50.0 | 88.9 | - | 60.3 | 56.7 |
T. Wilkerson
|
- | 6 | 20.3 | 10.5 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 6.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 51.3 | 33.3 | 68.8 | - | 59.3 | 52.6 |
A. Harris
|
NA | 4 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 6.5 | 7.2 | - | - | - | 61.5 | 58.3 | 66.7 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
S. Johnson
|
- | 7 | 27.0 | 9.9 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 7.6 | 7.3 | - | - | - | 49.1 | 27.3 | 57.9 | - | 56.2 | 54.7 |
T. Baines
|
- | 7 | 24.0 | 9.6 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 5.1 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 0 | 71.4 | - | 65.2 | 58.3 |
C. Lutz
|
- | 5 | 27.4 | 7.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 7.2 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 27.8 | 26.3 | 58.8 | - | 40.2 | 34.7 |
B. Powell
|
- | 2 | 22.5 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 37.5 | 75.0 | - | 51.0 | 45.0 |
D. Merthie
|
- | 7 | 17.4 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 4.1 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 31.0 | 33.3 | 60.0 | - | 43.4 | 39.7 |
S. Koger
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
O. Spann
|
- | 6 | 13.2 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 30.0 | 80.0 | - | 40.8 | 36.5 |
T. Walters
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
D. Pena
|
- | 5 | 9.8 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 42.9 | 57.1 | - | 58.7 | 56.2 |
M. Goode
|
- | 5 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 46.8 | 40.0 |
A. Barnette
|
G | 2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.5 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 6.7 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 12.3 | 6.7 |
R. Henriques
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
A. Williams
|
- | 7 | 4.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | - | 86.8 | 125.0 |
R. Gray
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
K. White
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG