Malone
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1131 (#71) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1192 (#42) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1115 (#58) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +15.8 (#41) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +13.0 (#169) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.822 (#230) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.916 (#127) | NetEff +18.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.893 (#210) | AdjNet +18.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.902 (#210) | AdjNet +18.8 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.750 (#211) | AdjO 69.5 | AdjD 57.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.724 (#70) | AdjO 66.0 | AdjD 55.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.805 (#94) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.796 (#92) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1196 (#47) | RD 104 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Wayne St. (MI) | W | 75 - 65 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | UIndy | W | 94 - 57 |
| 2025-11-18 | @ | Seton Hill | W | 81 - 72 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | Roosevelt | W | 83 - 57 |
| 2025-11-24 | @ | Lake Superior St. | W | 69 - 63 |
| 2025-11-26 | @ | Davenport | W | 70 - 56 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | Ursuline | W | 65 - 57 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Tiffin | W | 76 - 61 |
| 2025-12-11 | @ | Cedarville | W | 75 - 52 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Lake Erie | W | 72 - 51 |
| 2025-12-30 | vs | Bry. & Strat. (OH) USCAA | W | 108 - 33 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Hillsdale | L | 54 - 61 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Findlay | W | 73 - 64 |
| 2026-01-15 | vs | Ky. Wesleyan | L | 63 - 65 |
| 2026-01-17 | vs | Thomas More | W | 58 - 41 |
| 2026-01-22 | @ | Ohio Dominican | W | 63 - 52 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Walsh | W | 70 - 60 |
| 2026-01-29 | @ | Ashland | W | 68 - 65 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Northwood | L | 46 - 52 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Ursuline | W | 82 - 68 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erin Kaufman | - | 20 | 27.4 | 16.6 | 9.4 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 12.3 | 16.2 | 124 | 5.6 | 23.2 | 47.0 | 32.1 | 83.5 | 1.31 | 56.3 | 48.8 |
| Elena Oliver | - | 19 | 22.2 | 9.6 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 115 | 5.5 | 25.3 | 50.7 | 34.6 | 81.8 | 2.66 | 57.4 | 53.8 |
| Abbey Price | - | 10 | 21.1 | 8.3 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 59 | 5.4 | 26.4 | 39.0 | 16.7 | 76.2 | 3.16 | 45.5 | 40.9 |
| Meredith Randulic | - | 20 | 14.4 | 6.5 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 66 | 3.0 | 20.2 | 40.0 | 37.3 | 66.7 | -0.61 | 50.8 | 50.0 |
| Brinn Hunt | - | 20 | 22.9 | 6.2 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 5.2 | 117 | 5.3 | 29.9 | 37.0 | 36.4 | 60.0 | 3.74 | 50.7 | 50.4 |
| Kylee Bruce | - | 20 | 14.3 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 98 | 4.5 | 25.8 | 42.6 | 34.7 | 91.3 | 1.81 | 56.7 | 51.6 |
| Bridget Barber | - | 20 | 13.1 | 4.7 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 63 | 2.9 | 29.3 | 38.4 | 30.2 | 82.4 | -0.55 | 49.7 | 45.9 |
| Aila Miller | - | 17 | 11.5 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 51 | 2.7 | 38.6 | 36.8 | 28.6 | 69.2 | 1.8 | 43.4 | 40.8 |
| Anna Krupa | - | 20 | 18.4 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 5.2 | 96 | 4.4 | 35.5 | 43.8 | 32.1 | 38.7 | -1.14 | 49.1 | 50.0 |
| Irene Maroto | - | 19 | 16.3 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 80 | 3.8 | 24.4 | 34.6 | 29.6 | 81.2 | 0.25 | 43.7 | 39.5 |
| Nataley Armstrong | - | 17 | 20.5 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 21 | 1.1 | 6.4 | 30.8 | 35.0 | 70.0 | -1.57 | 41.3 | 36.2 |
| Katie Kaufman | - | 8 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 10 | 1.2 | 16.4 | 50.0 | 0 | 71.4 | -3.48 | 59.5 | 50.0 |
| Alyssa Geiser | - | 14 | 9.0 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 10 | 0.6 | 12.3 | 32.1 | 33.3 | 75.0 | -1.25 | 49.2 | 44.6 |
| Kamryn Ruffin | - | 17 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 7 | 0.4 | 5.2 | 34.2 | 27.8 | 50.0 | -1.88 | 41.8 | 40.8 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG