MSU Denver
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 945 (#325) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 916 (#419) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 880 (#547) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -0.3 (#236) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -4.3 (#389) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.619 (#273) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.120 (#278) | NetEff -16.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.788 (#243) | AdjNet +11.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.795 (#240) | AdjNet +11.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.691 (#240) | AdjO 81.1 | AdjD 72.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.385 (#470) | AdjO 73.2 | AdjD 78.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.343 (#436) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.344 (#435) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 853 (#411) | RD 100 | GP 22 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-16 | vs | Tex. A&M Int'l | L | 96 - 107 |
| 2025-11-17 | vs | Sul Ross St. | W | 113 - 103 |
| 2025-11-20 | @ | Tex. A&M-Kingsville | L | 61 - 92 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | St. Mary's (TX) | L | 59 - 75 |
| 2025-11-28 | @ | Eastern N.M. | L | 65 - 78 |
| 2025-11-29 | vs | UT Permian Basin | L | 93 - 103 |
| 2025-12-04 | vs | Fort Lewis | L | 76 - 81 |
| 2025-12-07 | vs | Adams St. | L | 59 - 87 |
| 2025-12-11 | @ | Western Colo. | W | 87 - 83 |
| 2025-12-13 | @ | Westminster (UT) | W | 81 - 70 |
| 2025-12-18 | vs | Fort Hays St. | L | 64 - 68 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Neb.-Kearney | W | 88 - 74 |
| 2026-01-08 | vs | South Dakota Mines | L | 62 - 68 |
| 2026-01-10 | vs | Black Hills St. | W | 77 - 73 |
| 2026-01-15 | @ | Colo. Christian | L | 70 - 79 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | UCCS | L | 85 - 98 |
| 2026-01-20 | vs | Regis (CO) | W | 85 - 68 |
| 2026-01-24 | @ | Colo. Sch. of Mines | L | 69 - 83 |
| 2026-01-29 | @ | N.M. Highlands | W | 95 - 83 |
| 2026-01-31 | @ | Fort Lewis | L | 72 - 101 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Colorado Mesa | L | 70 - 74 |
| 2026-02-07 | vs | Western Colo. | L | 69 - 75 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logan Threatt | - | 20 | 29.7 | 16.4 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 11.5 | 9.9 | -17 | -0.8 | -3.6 | 44.3 | 35.5 | 87.6 | 0.3 | 59.6 | 51.5 |
| Quave Propst-Allison | - | 22 | 29.1 | 14.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 10.5 | 9.2 | 30 | 1.4 | 6.5 | 45.7 | 45.2 | 77.9 | 3.98 | 60.1 | 55.9 |
| Garrett Falls | - | 18 | 26.1 | 12.7 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 8.6 | 7.6 | -24 | -1.3 | -14.3 | 46.8 | 40.0 | 78.5 | -0.34 | 60.4 | 53.9 |
| Amare Bethel | - | 20 | 19.9 | 8.6 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | -91 | -4.5 | -28.6 | 43.9 | 31.9 | 73.0 | -4.12 | 55.1 | 51.8 |
| Adam Hackett | - | 22 | 17.8 | 7.2 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 6.1 | 5.2 | -19 | -0.9 | -5.6 | 43.7 | 34.0 | 60.0 | 0.47 | 51.8 | 49.6 |
| Daniel Thomason | - | 22 | 21.5 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 4.2 | 6.4 | 34 | 1.5 | 9.2 | 44.6 | 27.6 | 71.4 | 1.02 | 54.3 | 48.9 |
| Caden Holmes | - | 18 | 18.4 | 5.2 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 4.8 | -40 | -2.2 | -24.3 | 43.6 | 31.2 | 55.0 | 0.89 | 54.1 | 53.2 |
| Nathan Macadory | - | 11 | 11.7 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 2.6 | -39 | -3.5 | -21.2 | 43.2 | 37.9 | 80.0 | -0.12 | 57.4 | 55.7 |
| Nathan Francis | - | 10 | 15.1 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 4.1 | 3.9 | -55 | -5.5 | -138.1 | 41.5 | 38.9 | 0.0 | -1.56 | 57.9 | 58.5 |
| Brian Unachukwu | - | 21 | 22.1 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 9.0 | -9 | -0.4 | -2.7 | 68.4 | 0 | 57.1 | 1.11 | 67.8 | 68.4 |
| Jacob Barker | - | 22 | 11.6 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 3.2 | -97 | -4.4 | -44.1 | 59.5 | 0 | 73.3 | -2.97 | 62.8 | 59.5 |
| Landon Braun | - | 8 | 5.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | -31 | -3.9 | -56.2 | 33.3 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.15 | 32.5 | 33.3 |
| Jackson McAdams | - | 10 | 4.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | -22 | -2.2 | -53.3 | 33.3 | 20.0 | 50.0 | -1.28 | 43.6 | 41.7 |
| Isaiah Freeman | - | 6 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | -32 | -5.3 | -202.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.0 | -1.27 | 35.7 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG