MIT Engineers
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +0.0 (#571) | HCA +3.1 |
2012 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-11-11 | @ | Harvard Crimson | L | 49 - 76 |
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W. Tashman
|
F | 1 | 33.0 | 16.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 30.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Hollingsworth
|
C | 1 | 34.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Kates
|
G | 1 | 33.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
B. Bender
|
G | 1 | 29.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Karraker
|
G | 1 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG