Loyola Marymount Lions
2012 Team Stats (6 games)
67.0
PPG
68.0
Opp
+3.2
Margin
43.8%
FG%
44.8%
3P%
75.5%
FT%
31.2
RPG
10.3
APG
11.0
TO
72.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1199 (#226) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1291 (#145) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +22.7 (#171) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.465 (#69) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.709 (#40) | NetEff +7.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.295 (#87) | AdjNet -7.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.294 (#86) | AdjNet -7.6 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Ireland
|
G | 31 | 36.3 | 16.0 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 20.0 | - | - | - | 46.9 | 47.1 | 71.9 | - | 194.8 | 54.0 |
D. Viney
|
F | 21 | 31.3 | 14.9 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 18.3 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 40.0 | 75.0 | - | 207.9 | 54.3 |
A. Hamilton
|
F | 19 | 28.2 | 11.9 | 5.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 12.7 | - | - | - | 49.3 | 66.7 | 74.4 | - | 128.2 | 54.9 |
J. DuBois
|
C | 27 | 28.7 | 10.3 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 10.9 | - | - | - | 40.3 | 34.8 | 84.2 | - | 172.3 | 45.8 |
L. Armstead
|
F | 29 | 21.7 | 8.0 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 10.6 | - | - | - | 44.7 | 47.4 | 100.0 | - | 256.2 | 56.6 |
C.J. Blackwell
|
F | 30 | 15.2 | 6.3 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 8.6 | - | - | - | 27.8 | 23.1 | 75.0 | 0.46 | 250.3 | 31.9 |
A. Egbeyemi
|
G | 27 | 19.3 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 6.4 | - | - | - | 37.1 | 31.2 | 66.7 | - | 152.8 | 44.3 |
G. Okonji
|
F | 30 | 20.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 46.2 | 0 | 57.1 | - | 185.0 | 46.2 |
T. Walker
|
G | 1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Q. Lawson
|
F | 18 | 13.1 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 322.7 | 25.0 |
E. Garibay
|
F | 12 | 14.2 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 425.0 | 25.0 |
A. Osborne
|
F | 29 | 12.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 197.2 | 40.0 |
T. Diederichs
|
F | 12 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 387.5 | 25.0 |
B. English
|
G | 17 | 7.2 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 700.0 | 0.0 |
K. Chine
|
G | 4 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
D. Latimer
|
G | 4 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG