Loyola Chicago Ramblers
2021 Team Stats (5 games)
55.8
PPG
65.8
Opp
-10.0
Margin
42.6%
FG%
31.0%
3P%
83.0%
FT%
31.0
RPG
10.4
APG
16.6
TO
71.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 950 (#300) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 974 (#265) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.3 (#176) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.175 (#297) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-13 | @ | DePaul Blue Demons | L | 67 - 76 |
| 2021-01-08 | @ | Missouri State Bears | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-09 | @ | Missouri State Bears | - | Preview |
| 2021-02-27 | @ | Missouri State Bears | L | 50 - 64 |
| 2021-02-28 | @ | Missouri State Bears | L | 45 - 59 |
| 2021-03-12 | @ | Illinois State Redbirds | W | 61 - 60 |
| 2021-03-13 | @ | Bradley Braves | L | 56 - 70 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Day
|
F | 5 | 31.0 | 15.0 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 10.8 | 11.4 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 50.0 | 85.7 | - | 62.3 | 58.3 |
E. Rice
|
G | 5 | 36.8 | 11.2 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 10.8 | 4.4 | - | - | - | 42.6 | 26.3 | 100.0 | - | 49.8 | 47.2 |
M. Chandler
|
G | 5 | 27.2 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 6.2 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 38.7 | 28.6 | 71.4 | - | 45.5 | 41.9 |
A. Meyer
|
G | 1 | 26.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 40.3 | 42.9 |
S. Galanopoulos
|
G | 5 | 33.4 | 5.6 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 38.5 | 35.7 | 60.0 | - | 49.6 | 48.1 |
B. Hampton-Bey
|
G | 4 | 16.2 | 5.5 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 45.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | 51.6 | 47.5 |
J. Gonzales
|
G | 2 | 13.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 28.6 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
A. Brown
|
G | 5 | 14.8 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 29.4 | 26.7 | 100.0 | - | 44.7 | 41.2 |
K. Nolan
|
F | 4 | 9.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 46.6 | 41.7 |
S. Tanin
|
F | 5 | 14.8 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 87.5 | - | 38.4 | 25.0 |
J. Hoefling
|
F | 5 | 9.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | - | 57.1 | 57.1 |
J. Johnson
|
G | 3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
K. Evans
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG