Loyola Chicago Ramblers
2011 Team Stats (4 games)
33.8
PPG
76.4
Opp
-26.2
Margin
35.5%
FG%
16.0%
3P%
73.0%
FT%
19.8
RPG
6.3
APG
0.0
TO
39.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 898 (#552) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 906 (#520) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +11.7 (#278) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.311 (#282) | - |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-12-09 | vs | DePaul Blue Demons | L | 48 - 80 |
| 2011-01-12 | @ | Green Bay Phoenix | L | 51 - 72 |
| 2011-02-12 | vs | Green Bay Phoenix | L | 43 - 69 |
| 2011-02-17 | @ | Valparaiso Beacons | L | 68 - 72 |
| 2011-03-09 | @ | Green Bay Phoenix | L | 41 - 89 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G. McCammon
|
- | 1 | 38.0 | 22.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 41.2 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 60.0 | 55.9 |
B. Averkamp
|
- | 1 | 36.0 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 21.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0.0 | 80.0 | - | 58.4 | 45.5 |
T. Hill
|
- | 1 | 30.0 | 16.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 14.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 60.0 | 50.0 | - | 53.8 | 53.6 |
M. Albano
|
NA | 4 | 0.0 | 11.5 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 14.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 29.3 | 24.2 | 80.0 | - | 38.2 | 36.2 |
A. Polka
|
- | 1 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 75.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 82.0 | 75.0 |
C. Kadima
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | - | 64.3 | 70.0 |
C. Stanley
|
- | 1 | 34.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 41.0 | 33.3 |
A. Skube
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 16.7 | 100.0 | - | 50.6 | 45.0 |
L. Sebetic
|
NA | 3 | 0.0 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
K. Kortekamp
|
NA | 4 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 29.2 | 0.0 | 85.7 | - | 36.9 | 29.2 |
B. Boeke
|
F | 4 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 50.3 | 50.0 |
E. Ayoub
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0.0 | 62.5 | - | 42.8 | 28.6 |
J. Benkoske
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
L. Samplawski
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
R. Sterling
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
S. Adams
|
- | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
D. Brito
|
- | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
J. Gac
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG